Tennessee Tech Golden
2012 Team Stats (2 games)
69.0
PPG
75.5
Opp
-6.5
Margin
44.7%
FG%
47.1%
3P%
52.6%
FT%
37.5
RPG
11.5
APG
16.5
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.9
Adj PPG
69.9
Adj Opp PPG
#203
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 993 (#174) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1022 (#148) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1018 (#146) | HCA +101 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -2.3 (#205) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -3.1 (#215) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.458 (#185) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.364 (#218) | AdjNet -4.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.361 (#218) | AdjNet -4.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.455 (#203) | AdjO 67.9 | AdjD 69.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.459 (#210) | AdjO 67.3 | AdjD 69.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.466 (#185) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.467 (#187) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1012 (#163) | RD 129 | GP 28 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Murphy
|
G | 30 | 34.8 | 20.5 | 5.4 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 5.6 | 20.5 | -20 | 26 | -0.8 | -1.0 | 47.3 | 41.9 | 65.5 | -1.07 | 159.5 | 55.1 |
J. Dillard
|
G | 30 | 33.3 | 17.1 | 8.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 3.9 | 21.6 | -22 | 26 | -0.8 | -1.1 | 59.0 | 40.0 | 83.3 | 0.39 | 179.2 | 59.8 |
Z. Swansey
|
G | 30 | 35.5 | 8.0 | 2.3 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 12.5 | -45 | 26 | -1.7 | -2.2 | 41.2 | 41.5 | 58.3 | -1.93 | 141.3 | 51.9 |
Z. Bailey
|
G | 30 | 25.5 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 9.7 | -66 | 26 | -2.5 | -4.5 | 36.4 | 37.5 | 69.2 | -1.48 | 214.6 | 46.6 |
L. McMorrow
|
C | 27 | 14.1 | 4.7 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 7.0 | -12 | 23 | -0.5 | -1.6 | 50.0 | 0 | 87.5 | -0.13 | 362.4 | 50.0 |
B. Inameti
|
F | 30 | 12.3 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 4.7 | -20 | 26 | -0.8 | -2.9 | 57.9 | 0.0 | 53.3 | -1.03 | 187.5 | 57.9 |
C. Dunn
|
G | 28 | 10.4 | 3.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 28 | 23 | 1.2 | 5.9 | 31.8 | 31.6 | 75.0 | 0.5 | 181.0 | 45.5 |
T. Barnes
|
F-C | 28 | 23.2 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 7.7 | 39 | 25 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 44.0 | 0 | 38.5 | 2.47 | 116.6 | 44.0 |
J. McKay
|
G | 24 | 8.1 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 4.7 | -12 | 21 | -0.6 | -3.3 | 83.3 | 0 | 45.5 | -0.53 | 295.2 | 83.3 |
D. Ogbe
|
F | 28 | 9.8 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 3.4 | -18 | 25 | -0.7 | -3.2 | 58.8 | 0.0 | 85.7 | -1.76 | 159.8 | 58.8 |
R. Hunley
|
G | 5 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.28 | 0 | 0 |
M. Hill
|
G | 4 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.28 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG