St. Thomas-Minnesota Tommies
Also known as: St. Thomas Tommies
Program History
2026 Team Stats (32 games)
64.8
PPG
62.2
Opp
+2.7
Margin
43.1%
FG%
32.1%
3P%
69.4%
FT%
34.1
RPG
13.7
APG
15.9
TO
77.3
Pace
58.2
Adj PPG
62.7
Adj Opp PPG
#220
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1022 (#172) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 960 (#207) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1035 (#142) | HCA +106 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.8 (#218) | HCA +2.4 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -3.0 (#202) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.410 (#205) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.410 (#205) | NetEff -2.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.312 (#219) | AdjNet -6.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.306 (#219) | AdjNet -7.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.397 (#220) | AdjO 58.2 | AdjD 62.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.480 (#189) | AdjO 60.3 | AdjD 61.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.424 (#201) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.440 (#198) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 940 (#219) | RD 148 | GP 29 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Sand
|
F | 32 | 31.8 | 14.2 | 7.9 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 10.6 | 14.0 | - | - | - | - | 49.7 | 29.3 | 64.2 | - | 55.3 | 51.5 |
F. Feuerbach
|
G | 32 | 30.8 | 9.6 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 8.2 | 5.1 | - | - | - | - | 38.6 | 33.1 | 74.6 | - | 52.0 | 48.1 |
J. Hood
|
G | 32 | 28.5 | 9.2 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 8.1 | 8.7 | - | - | - | - | 36.4 | 32.9 | 71.8 | - | 50.1 | 45.9 |
M. Werner
|
G | 31 | 23.6 | 8.2 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 5.5 | 6.9 | - | - | - | - | 60.8 | 21.1 | 70.5 | - | 64.4 | 62.0 |
S. McGowan
|
F | 28 | 18.5 | 7.1 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 6.0 | 5.8 | - | - | - | - | 47.9 | 27.6 | 62.5 | - | 52.6 | 50.3 |
L. Hauge
|
G | 32 | 18.1 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 5.7 | 1.8 | - | - | - | - | 32.4 | 33.3 | 82.6 | - | 47.4 | 44.8 |
A. McCall
|
F | 32 | 20.6 | 4.9 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 4.5 | - | - | - | - | 39.3 | 31.0 | 74.5 | - | 49.9 | 44.1 |
A. Vallance
|
G | 30 | 13.0 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 | - | - | - | - | 34.2 | 18.2 | 76.9 | - | 43.1 | 36.7 |
K. Ludwig
|
G | 25 | 10.5 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 51.3 | 40.7 | 75.0 | - | 67.0 | 65.4 |
S. Gardner
|
F | 7 | 3.0 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 | - | - | - | - | 66.7 | 75.0 | 100.0 | - | 94.5 | 91.7 |
L. Aalsma
|
G | 20 | 8.9 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | 31.6 | 28.6 | 75.0 | - | 40.9 | 36.8 |
A. Schliewe
|
F | 13 | 4.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | - | - | - | - | 53.3 | 0.0 | 16.7 | - | 48.2 | 53.3 |
S. Gage
|
G | 20 | 5.8 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | 34.5 | 36.4 | 50.0 | - | 41.8 | 41.4 |
R. Wright
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Lizzie Steingraber
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2025-2026 Shot Zones
1724 located field-goal attempts in 32 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
A. SandF. FeuerbachJ. HoodM. WernerS. McGowanL. Hauge
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 355-568 | 62.5 | 710 | A. Sand 34% (238 pts) | M. Werner 19% (138 pts) | A. Sand 31% (65 misses) | J. Hood 12% (26 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 156-423 | 36.9 | 312 | A. Sand 22% (70 pts) | S. McGowan 22% (70 pts) | A. Sand 28% (75 misses) | S. McGowan 13% (36 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 7-25 | 28.0 | 14 | L. Hauge 29% (4 pts) | A. Vallance 14% (2 pts) | L. Hauge 28% (5 misses) | L. Aalsma 22% (4 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 7-19 | 36.8 | 14 | A. Sand 43% (6 pts) | J. Hood 29% (4 pts) | S. McGowan 33% (4 misses) | J. Hood 17% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 11-44 | 25.0 | 22 | M. Werner 36% (8 pts) | L. Hauge 27% (6 pts) | J. Hood 30% (10 misses) | L. Hauge 24% (8 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 32-89 | 36.0 | 96 | F. Feuerbach 22% (21 pts) | J. Hood 19% (18 pts) | F. Feuerbach 33% (19 misses) | L. Hauge 25% (14 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 31-80 | 38.8 | 93 | F. Feuerbach 29% (27 pts) | J. Hood 23% (21 pts) | J. Hood 31% (15 misses) | L. Hauge 22% (11 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 57-200 | 28.5 | 171 | L. Hauge 28% (48 pts) | J. Hood 26% (45 pts) | L. Hauge 27% (39 misses) | J. Hood 22% (31 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 25-102 | 24.5 | 75 | A. Sand 32% (24 pts) | F. Feuerbach 28% (21 pts) | F. Feuerbach 22% (17 misses) | A. Sand 21% (16 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 62-174 | 35.6 | 186 | J. Hood 29% (54 pts) | F. Feuerbach 26% (48 pts) | J. Hood 29% (33 misses) | F. Feuerbach 28% (31 misses) |