Providence
2015 Team Stats (11 games)
67.0
PPG
65.8
Opp
+1.0
Margin
42.4%
FG%
36.4%
3P%
71.9%
FT%
35.9
RPG
13.3
APG
13.1
TO
76.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2014-2015
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1374 (#113) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1422 (#79) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.4 (#59) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.761 (#14) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.377 (#33) | NetEff -4.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.312 (#81) | AdjNet -6.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.310 (#81) | AdjNet -6.9 |
2015 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-11-15 | vs | Albany Great Danes | W | 64 - 60 |
| 2014-11-20 | vs | Navy Midshipmen | W | 88 - 51 |
| 2014-11-30 | @ | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 38 - 58 |
| 2015-02-04 | @ | Georgetown Hoyas | W | 74 - 71 |
| 2015-02-11 | vs | Villanova Wildcats | L | 68 - 74 |
| 2015-02-24 | @ | Villanova Wildcats | L | 61 - 89 |
| 2015-03-01 | vs | Marquette Golden Eagles | W | 77 - 66 |
| 2015-03-04 | @ | Seton Hall Pirates | W | 79 - 66 |
| 2015-03-07 | vs | Butler Bulldogs | L | 64 - 68 |
| 2015-03-12 | vs | St. John's Red Storm | W | 74 - 57 |
| 2015-03-13 | @ | Villanova Wildcats | L | 61 - 63 |
| 2015-03-20 | vs | Dayton Flyers | L | 53 - 66 |
2015 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Henton
|
F | 12 | 36.6 | 16.5 | 7.2 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 12.1 | 11.6 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 41.4 | 72.1 | - | 60.4 | 50.3 |
J. Dunn
|
G | 12 | 33.9 | 13.2 | 4.7 | 7.5 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 4.2 | 11.5 | 12.4 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 41.3 | 37.9 | 68.1 | 0.21 | 50.1 | 45.3 |
T. Harris
|
F | 12 | 26.2 | 10.9 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 6.8 | 9.0 | -27 | -2.5 | -6.4 | 45.7 | 25.0 | 74.4 | 0.53 | 66.7 | 48.8 |
B. Bentil
|
- | 12 | 25.7 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 6.4 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 41.7 | 75.0 | - | 57.6 | 48.7 |
C. Desrosiers
|
F | 10 | 24.7 | 5.6 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 50.0 | 85.0 | - | 65.4 | 51.5 |
K. Cartwright
|
G | 12 | 19.1 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 28.9 | 13.3 | 54.5 | - | 42.1 | 31.1 |
J. Lindsey
|
G | 12 | 14.6 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 37.8 | 38.5 | 60.0 | - | 52.3 | 51.4 |
P. Chukwu
|
C | 12 | 11.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 68.4 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 72.1 | 68.4 |
J. Lomomba
|
G | 11 | 12.1 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 33.3 | 64.3 | - | 54.2 | 40.6 |
T. Bancroft
|
G | 3 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
C. Woodring
|
G | 2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
T. Planek
|
F | 3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG