Pittsburgh
2013 Team Stats (17 games)
63.5
PPG
58.5
Opp
+5.0
Margin
44.0%
FG%
32.8%
3P%
65.8%
FT%
33.2
RPG
14.4
APG
11.7
TO
-
Est. poss./game
68.7
Adj PPG
52.4
Adj Opp PPG
#10
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1317 (#30) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1241 (#35) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1060 (#92) | HCA +102 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +17.4 (#11) | HCA +3.1 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +14.5 (#21) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.919 (#5) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.966 (#10) | AdjNet +28.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.967 (#10) | AdjNet +29.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.816 (#10) | AdjO 68.7 | AdjD 52.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.694 (#27) | AdjO 66.1 | AdjD 57.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.846 (#17) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.827 (#21) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1223 (#43) | RD 117 | GP 33 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Travon Woodall
|
G | 33 | 28.6 | 11.5 | 2.6 | 5.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 6.0 | 12.3 | 368 | 30 | 12.3 | 17.8 | 40.6 | 33.0 | 76.9 | 5.44 | 86.0 | 49.7 |
Lamar Patterson
|
G | 33 | 27.0 | 10.0 | 4.3 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 11.6 | 312 | 30 | 10.4 | 16.2 | 45.4 | 32.1 | 62.5 | 4.09 | 80.2 | 52.9 |
Talib Zanna
|
F | 33 | 23.9 | 9.6 | 6.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 11.8 | 234 | 30 | 7.8 | 13.7 | 42.2 | 0 | 62.0 | 0.02 | 86.9 | 42.2 |
J.J. Moore
|
F | 33 | 18.7 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 188 | 30 | 6.3 | 14.3 | 45.0 | 40.7 | 74.2 | 2.23 | 91.3 | 53.4 |
Steven Adams
|
C | 32 | 23.4 | 7.2 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 12.4 | 266 | 29 | 9.2 | 16.4 | 54.2 | 0 | 44.7 | 3.58 | 90.5 | 54.2 |
James Robinson
|
G | 33 | 26.6 | 6.1 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 8.1 | 237 | 30 | 7.9 | 12.3 | 34.8 | 29.0 | 77.8 | -0.4 | 72.3 | 38.8 |
Dante Taylor
|
F | 32 | 15.7 | 5.0 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 6.9 | 115 | 29 | 4.0 | 10.7 | 54.2 | 0 | 69.7 | 0.85 | 82.0 | 54.2 |
Trey Zeigler
|
G | 31 | 15.5 | 4.4 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 69 | 28 | 2.5 | 6.7 | 39.2 | 0.0 | 47.1 | -1.51 | 76.4 | 39.2 |
Cameron Wright
|
G | 31 | 14.6 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 4.7 | 131 | 28 | 4.7 | 13.9 | 50.7 | 42.9 | 54.5 | 0.92 | 81.8 | 52.8 |
Durand Johnson
|
F | 31 | 11.9 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 3.4 | 85 | 28 | 3.0 | 11.4 | 39.0 | 36.7 | 64.7 | 0.64 | 78.7 | 50.6 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG