🐻⬇️🏀

Notre Dame

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Notre Dame Fighting Irish, Notre Dame
Program History
Coach: Mike Brey

2013 Team Stats (24 games)

68.5
PPG
63.5
Opp
+6.5
Margin
46.1%
FG%
35.2%
3P%
70.0%
FT%
36.0
RPG
16.8
APG
12.0
TO
74.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1358 (#125) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1592 (#16) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 1081 (#68) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +33.7 (#54) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +22.7 (#24) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.735 (#18) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +9.4 More → 0.744 (#47) NetEff +9.4
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +19.4 More → 0.905 (#9) AdjNet +19.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +19.8 More → 0.909 (#8) AdjNet +19.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.4 | AdjD 59.9 More → 0.664 (#53) AdjO 67.4 | AdjD 59.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.898 (#30) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.878 (#30) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 109 | GP 35 More → 1245 (#43) RD 109 | GP 35

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-10 vs Evansville Purple Aces W 58 - 49
2012-11-12 vs Monmouth Hawks W 84 - 57
2012-11-16 @ Saint Joseph's Hawks L 70 - 79
2012-11-17 vs BYU Cougars W 78 - 68
2012-11-21 vs George Washington Colonials W 65 - 48
2012-11-24 vs St. Francis (PA) Red Flash W 69 - 52
2012-11-26 vs Chicago State Cougars W 92 - 65
2012-11-29 vs Kentucky Wildcats W 64 - 50
2012-12-08 vs Brown Bears W 84 - 57
2012-12-15 vs Purdue Boilermakers W 81 - 68
2012-12-17 vs Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons W 74 - 62
2012-12-19 vs Kennesaw State Owls W 85 - 57
2012-12-21 vs Niagara Purple Eagles W 89 - 67
2013-01-05 vs Seton Hall Pirates W 93 - 74
2013-01-07 @ Cincinnati Bearcats W 66 - 60
2013-01-12 vs UConn Huskies L 58 - 65
2013-01-15 @ St. John's Red Storm L 63 - 67
2013-01-19 vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights W 69 - 66
2013-01-21 vs Georgetown Hoyas L 47 - 63
2013-01-26 @ South Florida Bulls W 73 - 65
2013-01-30 vs Villanova Wildcats W 65 - 60
2013-02-02 @ DePaul Blue Demons W 79 - 71
2013-02-04 @ Syracuse Orange L 47 - 63
2013-02-09 vs Louisville Cardinals W 104 - 101
2013-02-13 vs DePaul Blue Demons W 82 - 78
2013-02-16 @ Providence Friars L 54 - 71
2013-02-18 @ Pittsburgh Panthers W 51 - 42
2013-02-24 vs Cincinnati Bearcats W 62 - 41
2013-03-02 @ Marquette Golden Eagles L 64 - 72
2013-03-05 vs St. John's Red Storm W 66 - 40
2013-03-09 @ Louisville Cardinals L 57 - 73
2013-03-13 vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights W 69 - 61
2013-03-14 @ Marquette Golden Eagles W 73 - 65
2013-03-15 @ Louisville Cardinals L 57 - 69
2013-03-22 vs Iowa State Cyclones L 58 - 76

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Natalie Achonwa Natalie Achonwa - 1 0.0 23.0 12.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 13.0 25.0 - - - 76.9 0 100.0 - 80.3 76.9
A. Braker A. Braker - 1 0.0 15.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 7.0 17.0 - - - 85.7 0 50.0 - 77.8 85.7
J. Loyd J. Loyd - 1 0.0 15.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 0.0 4.0 10.0 9.0 179 4.8 8.8 50.0 25.0 100.0 1.2 63.8 55.0
J. Grant J. Grant G 35 36.3 13.3 2.9 5.5 1.3 0.2 2.9 9.5 10.9 - - - 40.7 34.4 70.9 0.69 61.1 47.4
J. Cooley J. Cooley F 35 29.3 13.1 10.1 0.8 0.7 1.2 1.4 7.3 17.2 - - - 58.7 100.0 68.5 1.01 73.6 58.9
E. Atkins E. Atkins G 35 38.3 11.2 2.6 5.5 1.4 0.1 2.1 7.6 11.1 233 6.7 7.6 43.8 41.3 65.8 1.68 65.1 51.9
P. Connaughton P. Connaughton G 35 32.1 8.9 4.7 2.1 0.5 0.3 0.9 6.0 9.6 - - - 44.5 36.2 71.8 1.31 67.9 55.5
K. McBride K. McBride - 1 0.0 8.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 11.0 - - - 100.0 0 100.0 - 103.1 100.0
S. Martin S. Martin G 18 29.7 7.9 5.9 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.7 5.2 10.4 179 9.9 14.9 46.2 45.8 57.1 1.63 72.1 60.8
G. Sherman G. Sherman C 30 15.6 7.0 3.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.2 4.4 5.8 80 2.7 6.1 54.5 0 63.2 0.62 70.9 54.5
C. Biedscheid C. Biedscheid G 34 17.4 6.2 1.4 1.0 0.2 0.3 0.9 5.1 3.0 33 1.0 1.8 35.6 31.1 80.0 -0.18 54.8 45.1
T. Knight T. Knight F 28 17.5 5.5 3.5 0.8 0.3 0.9 0.6 4.3 6.0 220 6.7 14.1 50.8 0 72.7 1.4 57.2 50.8
Z. Auguste Z. Auguste C 25 10.7 3.7 2.7 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.9 2.9 3.8 -26 -1.0 -3.3 52.8 0 68.2 -0.55 56.9 52.8
A. Burgett A. Burgett F 18 3.3 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 -5 -0.3 -1.8 25.0 0.0 100.0 0.02 56.4 25.0
P. Crowley P. Crowley G 15 2.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 0.1 0.7 33.3 0 0 0.15 33.3 33.3

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG