North Carolina Tar Heels
2021 Team Stats (4 games)
78.0
PPG
76.8
Opp
-0.2
Margin
44.0%
FG%
37.6%
3P%
75.9%
FT%
40.3
RPG
16.0
APG
13.3
TO
84.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1266 (#42) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1355 (#29) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +44.7 (#22) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.925 (#16) | - |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-13 | @ | Louisville Cardinals | - | Preview |
| 2020-12-17 | vs | Syracuse Orange | W | 92 - 68 |
| 2020-12-31 | @ | Syracuse Orange | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-19 | @ | Syracuse Orange | L | 76 - 88 |
| 2021-01-28 | @ | Louisville Cardinals | L | 68 - 79 |
| 2021-02-07 | vs | NC State Wolfpack | W | 76 - 69 |
| 2021-03-22 | @ | Alabama Crimson Tide | L | 71 - 80 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Bailey
|
C | 5 | 29.2 | 16.8 | 6.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 14.0 | 9.6 | - | - | - | 48.6 | 0.0 | 88.9 | - | 53.9 | 48.6 |
S. Watts
|
G | 5 | 30.4 | 14.2 | 6.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 10.6 | 13.2 | - | - | - | 43.4 | 44.8 | 85.7 | - | 60.0 | 55.7 |
P. Holesinska
|
G | 5 | 24.2 | 14.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 10.0 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 44.1 | 75.0 | - | 66.3 | 65.0 |
A. Ustby
|
G | 5 | 32.4 | 11.6 | 6.8 | 3.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 9.4 | 13.2 | - | - | - | 51.1 | 61.5 | 100.0 | - | 60.6 | 59.6 |
D. Kelly
|
G | 5 | 31.8 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 10.0 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 22.0 | 25.0 | 88.9 | - | 36.3 | 26.0 |
K. Todd-Williams
|
G | 5 | 20.2 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 11.1 | 68.8 | - | 45.1 | 35.4 |
A. Poole
|
F | 4 | 15.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 3.8 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 60.0 | - | 41.2 | 33.3 |
A. Zelaya
|
F | 2 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
M. Tshitenge
|
F | 4 | 15.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 51.0 | 60.0 |
A. Young
|
G | 5 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
K. Tucker
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG