🐻⬇️🏀

NJIT

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2016
Also known as: NJIT Highlanders
Program History
Coach: Grant Billmeier

2026 Team Stats (32 games)

66.9
PPG
73.5
Opp
-6.6
Margin
40.5%
FG%
30.4%
3P%
70.6%
FT%
34.5
RPG
10.8
APG
11.6
TO
77.5
Pace
65.0
AdjO
79.0
AdjD
#338
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 860 (#286) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 907 (#248) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +109 elo More → 1017 (#156) HCA +109 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.2 More → -14.1 (#337) HCA +2.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.5 More → +0.4 (#358) HCA +2.5
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.225 (#322) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -18.5 More → 0.135 (#299) NetEff -18.5
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -19.8 More → 0.092 (#341) AdjNet -19.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -20.1 More → 0.088 (#341) AdjNet -20.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 65.0 | AdjD 79.0 More → 0.219 (#338) AdjO 65.0 | AdjD 79.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 67.4 | AdjD 71.4 More → 0.410 (#598) AdjO 67.4 | AdjD 71.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.498 (#345) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.472 (#350) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 139 | GP 32 More → 955 (#284) RD 139 | GP 32

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-04 @ Fordham Rams W 72 - 61
2025-11-08 vs Fairfield Stags L 53 - 74
2025-11-11 @ Loyola Maryland Greyhounds W 66 - 64
2025-11-15 vs Fairleigh Dickinson Knights W 93 - 81
2025-11-18 @ Drexel Dragons L 43 - 75
2025-11-22 @ Navy Midshipmen L 70 - 86
2025-11-24 @ Cincinnati Bearcats L 67 - 94
2025-11-26 @ Louisville Cardinals L 47 - 104
2025-11-28 @ Eastern Michigan Eagles L 55 - 73
2025-12-05 @ High Point Panthers L 72 - 89
2025-12-13 vs Sacred Heart Pioneers L 49 - 65
2025-12-22 @ Butler Bulldogs L 52 - 101
2025-12-29 vs SUNY-Canton Roos W 95 - 60
2025-12-31 @ Pennsylvania Quakers L 61 - 80
2026-01-03 @ Binghamton Bearcats W 73 - 65
2026-01-08 vs New Hampshire Wildcats W 80 - 76
2026-01-10 vs Maine Black Bears L 70 - 74
2026-01-15 @ UMass Lowell River Hawks W 73 - 64
2026-01-19 vs Bryant Bulldogs W 79 - 55
2026-01-22 @ UMBC Retrievers L 74 - 87
2026-01-29 @ UAlbany Great Danes W 77 - 68
2026-01-31 @ Vermont Catamounts W 79 - 77
2026-02-05 vs UMass Lowell River Hawks W 81 - 56
2026-02-07 vs Binghamton Bearcats W 73 - 64
2026-02-12 @ New Hampshire Wildcats W 76 - 70
2026-02-14 @ Maine Black Bears W 67 - 58
2026-02-19 vs UAlbany Great Danes L 63 - 81
2026-02-21 vs Vermont Catamounts L 64 - 70
2026-02-28 @ Bryant Bulldogs L 52 - 69
2026-03-03 vs UMBC Retrievers L 52 - 91
2026-03-07 vs Maine Black Bears W 60 - 58
2026-03-10 @ Vermont Catamounts L 54 - 63

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
S. Robinson S. Robinson - 29 27.8 14.9 3.0 2.2 1.3 0.1 2.0 12.4 7.2 -29 -1.5 -3.2 45.4 24.5 69.4 -0.69 51.6 47.1
David Bolden David Bolden - 32 29.8 11.9 2.8 2.7 1.9 0.0 2.0 10.9 6.3 -131 -6.0 -8.8 31.9 32.4 81.5 -1.04 48.0 42.0
A. Fulton A. Fulton - 32 28.2 10.8 6.1 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.4 8.4 9.4 -90 -3.9 -6.0 41.9 26.5 78.8 -0.6 53.7 46.9
M. Ebonkoli M. Ebonkoli - 21 26.1 7.3 5.7 0.6 0.4 1.0 1.7 6.1 7.3 19 1.9 3.3 51.6 0 52.4 0.33 52.6 51.6
J. Clayville J. Clayville G 15 18.9 6.4 1.6 1.4 0.3 0.1 1.3 7.5 1.0 -101 -6.7 -14.7 31.0 29.9 100.0 -0.94 42.0 41.2
J. Rogers J. Rogers - 32 26.7 5.7 5.3 2.2 0.9 0.6 1.5 4.6 8.6 -108 -4.9 -8.0 47.6 32.8 62.9 -0.54 55.7 54.1
Q. Duncan Q. Duncan - 32 13.5 4.5 1.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 4.0 2.9 -87 -4.0 -13.8 39.1 38.1 52.0 -1.13 52.2 51.6
J. Kelly J. Kelly - 32 15.4 4.2 2.5 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.6 3.2 4.0 -116 -5.3 -13.6 40.2 31.4 71.7 -1.11 53.0 45.6
M. Arrington M. Arrington - 28 13.9 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.8 2.6 5.1 -80 -3.8 -10.3 58.1 0 55.3 -0.59 59.0 58.1
Rocco Awad Rocco Awad - 32 12.9 3.2 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.6 3.5 1.3 -90 -4.1 -12.0 30.4 27.1 76.9 -0.58 42.9 40.6
C. Piggee C. Piggee - 18 5.4 1.8 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.7 0.7 -13 -1.0 -8.1 29.0 32.0 85.7 -0.08 46.9 41.9
Zack Scherler Zack Scherler - 19 6.4 1.0 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.7 -77 -6.4 -33.1 50.0 0 55.6 -0.78 52.9 50.0
J. Akintolu J. Akintolu - 19 5.6 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.7 -26 -1.9 -18.1 25.0 13.3 50.0 -0.22 32.2 30.0
Stefan Jimenez-Vojnic Stefan Jimenez-Vojnic C 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
AJ Altobelli AJ Altobelli G 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG