๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Minnesota Timberwolves

Also known as: Minnesota Timberwolves
Program History

2006 Team Stats (77 games)

91.4
PPG
93.3
Opp
-1.9
Margin
45.5%
FG%
32.5%
3P%
75.6%
FT%
39.4
RPG
20.8
APG
13.6
TO
91.0
Est. poss./game
90.0
Adj PPG
92.0
Adj Opp PPG
#21
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2005-2006
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 843 (#25) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 923 (#24) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +96 elo More โ†’ 934 (#27) HCA +96 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.5 More โ†’ -2.0 (#21) HCA +3.5
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.7 More โ†’ -4.0 (#26) HCA +3.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.435 (#22) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -2.3 More โ†’ 0.435 (#22) NetEff -2.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -2.1 More โ†’ 0.440 (#21) AdjNet -2.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -2.1 More โ†’ 0.439 (#21) AdjNet -2.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 90.0 | AdjD 92.0 More โ†’ 0.454 (#21) AdjO 90.0 | AdjD 92.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 90.8 | AdjD 94.1 More โ†’ 0.424 (#26) AdjO 90.8 | AdjD 94.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.394 (#26) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.388 (#26) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 255 | GP 79 More โ†’ 918 (#25) RD 255 | GP 79

2006 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2005-11-02 vs Portland Trail Blazers W 90 - 86
2005-11-04 @ Oklahoma City Thunder L 102 - 107
2005-11-05 @ LA Clippers L 99 - 100
2005-11-07 vs LA Clippers W 93 - 78
2005-11-09 vs Los Angeles Lakers W 88 - 74
2005-11-13 @ Denver Nuggets L 91 - 102
2005-11-15 vs Houston Rockets L 89 - 94
2005-11-19 vs Charlotte Hornets W 102 - 89
2005-11-23 @ New Orleans Pelicans L 80 - 84
2005-11-25 vs Milwaukee Bucks W 99 - 91
2005-11-29 vs LA Clippers L 84 - 93
2005-12-02 @ Los Angeles Lakers W 113 - 108
2005-12-04 @ Sacramento Kings W 85 - 77
2005-12-05 @ Utah Jazz W 91 - 77
2005-12-07 @ Portland Trail Blazers W 84 - 74
2005-12-10 vs Los Angeles Lakers W 95 - 82
2005-12-12 @ Philadelphia 76ers L 89 - 90
2005-12-13 vs Sacramento Kings L 91 - 93
2005-12-15 vs San Antonio Spurs L 88 - 90
2005-12-18 @ Dallas Mavericks L 95 - 102
2005-12-21 vs New Orleans Pelicans W 88 - 69
2005-12-23 vs Portland Trail Blazers L 83 - 91
2005-12-26 vs Phoenix Suns L 89 - 103
2005-12-28 vs Oklahoma City Thunder W 108 - 95
2005-12-30 @ Orlando Magic L 87 - 107
2006-01-01 @ Miami Heat L 70 - 97
2006-01-04 vs Dallas Mavericks W 91 - 78
2006-01-06 @ San Antonio Spurs L 77 - 83
2006-01-07 @ Dallas Mavericks L 79 - 83
2006-01-11 vs Chicago Bulls W 99 - 93
2006-01-13 vs Denver Nuggets W 103 - 89
2006-01-16 @ New York Knicks W 96 - 90
2006-01-18 @ Boston Celtics L 96 - 103
2006-01-20 vs Indiana Pacers W 90 - 85
2006-01-22 vs Philadelphia 76ers L 84 - 86
2006-01-24 vs Detroit Pistons L 83 - 107
2006-01-25 @ Memphis Grizzlies L 87 - 107
2006-01-27 @ Houston Rockets W 96 - 92
2006-01-28 @ San Antonio Spurs L 88 - 102
2006-01-30 vs Boston Celtics W 110 - 85
2006-02-01 @ Detroit Pistons L 74 - 90
2006-02-03 @ Portland Trail Blazers L 85 - 89
2006-02-04 @ Golden State Warriors L 77 - 109
2006-02-06 @ Phoenix Suns W 103 - 101
2006-02-08 vs Cleveland Cavaliers L 91 - 97
2006-02-10 vs Utah Jazz L 80 - 94
2006-02-11 vs New Orleans Pelicans L 94 - 100
2006-02-13 vs Toronto Raptors L 94 - 98
2006-02-15 vs Oklahoma City Thunder W 102 - 92
2006-02-21 @ Washington Wizards L 78 - 90
2006-02-24 vs Denver Nuggets L 101 - 102
2006-02-26 vs Memphis Grizzlies W 105 - 99
2006-02-28 @ Chicago Bulls - Incomplete score
2006-03-01 vs Brooklyn Nets W 100 - 90
2006-03-05 vs Golden State Warriors W 103 - 90
2006-03-07 vs Houston Rockets L 87 - 93
2006-03-08 @ Utah Jazz L 93 - 96
2006-03-10 @ Oklahoma City Thunder L 96 - 107
2006-03-11 @ Phoenix Suns L 102 - 110
2006-03-13 @ LA Clippers L 87 - 95
2006-03-15 @ Los Angeles Lakers L 89 - 92
2006-03-16 @ Golden State Warriors L 97 - 105
2006-03-19 vs Sacramento Kings W 95 - 89
2006-03-21 vs Miami Heat W 100 - 96
2006-03-23 @ Brooklyn Nets L 82 - 86
2006-03-24 @ Toronto Raptors L 77 - 97
2006-03-26 vs New York Knicks W 98 - 94
2006-03-29 vs Orlando Magic W 103 - 91
2006-03-31 @ Denver Nuggets L 94 - 106
2006-04-02 vs Golden State Warriors W 106 - 104
2006-04-04 @ Charlotte Hornets L 92 - 97
2006-04-05 @ Atlanta Hawks L 99 - 101
2006-04-07 vs Utah Jazz L 95 - 103
2006-04-09 vs Atlanta Hawks W 84 - 83
2006-04-11 @ Memphis Grizzlies L 76 - 92
2006-04-12 @ Houston Rockets W 82 - 79
2006-04-14 @ Indiana Pacers L 77 - 89
2006-04-16 vs San Antonio Spurs L 90 - 103
2006-04-19 vs Memphis Grizzlies - Incomplete score

2006 Roster

Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kevin Garnett Kevin Garnett G 72 38.8 21.7 12.7 4.0 1.4 1.4 2.4 15.7 23.2 - - - - 52.1 26.9 81.2 - 58.6 52.4
Wally Szczerbiak G 37 39.4 20.3 4.8 2.8 0.5 0.4 2.1 15.0 11.8 - - - - 49.3 39.8 90.0 - 59.8 54.1
Ricky Davis G 35 40.6 19.4 4.5 4.8 1.2 0.2 2.7 16.6 10.7 - - - - 43.0 28.9 81.0 - 51.3 45.8
Marcus Banks G 38 30.7 11.7 2.8 4.7 1.2 0.3 2.4 9.7 8.6 - - - - 47.8 33.3 75.2 - 53.6 49.6
Mark Blount G 40 27.7 10.2 5.0 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.7 8.4 7.3 - - - - 51.3 0 74.1 - 54.6 51.3
Trenton Hassell G 72 32.8 9.3 2.8 2.6 0.5 0.4 1.6 8.1 5.9 - - - - 46.1 30.0 73.8 - 50.8 46.7
Troy Hudson G 33 22.0 8.9 1.1 2.8 0.4 0.1 0.9 9.0 3.3 - - - - 36.9 36.7 93.3 - 46.4 42.4
Rashad McCants G 74 17.4 8.0 1.9 0.8 0.6 0.3 1.1 6.9 3.5 - - - - 45.0 38.0 73.7 - 53.9 51.4
Marko Jaric G 71 27.8 7.7 3.1 3.9 1.5 0.3 1.7 7.5 7.3 - - - - 39.0 30.5 68.4 - 46.2 42.7
Bracey Wright G 6 16.8 7.2 2.3 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.8 6.2 3.5 - - - - 35.1 27.3 87.5 - 48.8 39.2
Justin Reed G 38 17.5 6.4 2.4 0.9 0.4 0.3 0.9 5.5 3.9 - - - - 44.0 0.0 76.6 - 50.0 44.0
Michael Olowokandi G 29 23.5 6.0 5.8 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.3 6.0 6.4 - - - - 46.0 0 42.9 - 46.2 46.0
Eddie Griffin G 66 18.8 4.4 5.3 0.5 0.2 2.0 0.6 5.1 6.7 - - - - 35.0 18.7 58.0 - 39.5 37.1
Anthony Carter G 43 13.5 3.4 1.4 2.3 0.6 0.2 0.9 3.2 3.9 - - - - 38.2 26.7 71.7 - 45.8 39.7
Ronald Dupree G 33 6.9 2.2 1.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 1.7 2.1 - - - - 52.6 0.0 37.8 - 50.5 52.6
Richie Frahm G 22 7.9 2.1 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 2.3 1.3 - - - - 31.4 27.5 60.0 - 43.2 42.2
Mark Madsen G 57 11.1 1.2 2.4 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.9 3.1 - - - - 51.0 0 44.4 - 50.9 51.0
Nikoloz Tskitishvili C 5 2.6 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 -0.2 - - - - 25.0 0 50.0 - 30.7 25.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG