Lafayette Leopards

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Also known as: Lafayette Leopards

Program History

2026 Team Stats (30 games)

58.9

PPG

62.9

Opp

-4.0

Margin

38.3%

FG%

34.2%

3P%

77.7%

FT%

32.8

RPG

11.4

APG

13.8

65.6

Est. poss./game

57.3

Adj PPG

67.6

Adj Opp PPG

#282

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	778 (#291)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	830 (#288)	-
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +106 elo More →	930 (#261)	HCA +106 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More →	-11.7 (#288)	HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More →	-8.8 (#267)	HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.320 (#234)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -5.9 More →	0.320 (#234)	NetEff -5.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -18.3 More →	0.108 (#296)	AdjNet -18.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -18.8 More →	0.102 (#296)	AdjNet -18.8
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 57.3 \| AdjD 67.6 More →	0.282 (#282)	AdjO 57.3 \| AdjD 67.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 57.6 \| AdjD 62.7 More →	0.386 (#253)	AdjO 57.6 \| AdjD 62.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.241 (#285)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.259 (#284)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 141 \| GP 30 More →	863 (#266)	RD 141 \| GP 30

2026 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2025-11-03	@	Villanova Wildcats	L	38 - 70
2025-11-06	@	Rider Broncs	L	58 - 65
2025-11-09	vs	Le Moyne Dolphins	L	79 - 82
2025-11-13	vs	Saint Peter's Peacocks	W	76 - 58
2025-11-16	@	Saint Francis Red Wolves	W	69 - 55
2025-11-20	@	Wagner Seahawks	W	56 - 53
2025-11-25	@	Pittsburgh Panthers	W	76 - 59
2025-11-30	@	NJIT Highlanders	L	60 - 71
2025-12-04	@	Fairleigh Dickinson Knights	L	61 - 69
2025-12-07	vs	Marist Red Foxes	L	76 - 79
2025-12-20	@	Rutgers Scarlet Knights	L	45 - 54
2025-12-31	@	Colgate Raiders	L	57 - 63
2026-01-03	vs	Loyola Maryland Greyhounds	W	63 - 52
2026-01-07	@	Boston University Terriers	W	65 - 64
2026-01-10	vs	Navy Midshipmen	L	58 - 97
2026-01-14	@	Bucknell Bison	W	62 - 49
2026-01-17	@	Holy Cross Crusaders	L	48 - 70
2026-01-21	vs	Boston University Terriers	L	55 - 66
2026-01-24	@	Lehigh Mountain Hawks	L	48 - 62
2026-01-28	vs	Bucknell Bison	W	65 - 56
2026-01-31	vs	American University Eagles	L	60 - 70
2026-02-04	@	Navy Midshipmen	L	46 - 62
2026-02-07	vs	Army Black Knights	L	50 - 62
2026-02-11	@	Loyola Maryland Greyhounds	L	58 - 65
2026-02-14	vs	Lehigh Mountain Hawks	W	73 - 59
2026-02-18	vs	Holy Cross Crusaders	L	44 - 53
2026-02-21	@	American University Eagles	W	56 - 41
2026-02-28	@	Army Black Knights	L	42 - 61
2026-03-04	vs	Colgate Raiders	W	66 - 55
2026-03-09	@	Army Black Knights	L	57 - 65

2026 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Teresa Kiewiet	G	28	34.0	16.3	6.1	1.2	1.0	0.3	1.9	14.1	9.0	-121	27	-4.5	-5.4	42.8	36.6	80.4	-1.83	51.9	47.5
Talia Zurinskas	G	30	32.7	10.6	1.7	3.8	0.9	0.1	3.4	10.4	3.2	-27	29	-0.9	-1.2	34.8	31.3	82.4	0.71	45.2	39.0
Haylie Adamski	G	30	27.5	9.4	2.9	0.8	1.2	0.2	1.2	8.2	5.1	-60	29	-2.1	-3.1	40.1	37.6	73.1	-2.62	54.6	53.2
Sauda Ntaconayigize	G	25	33.7	9.4	3.0	1.3	0.9	0.4	1.3	8.4	5.4	-18	24	-0.8	-0.9	37.4	38.8	82.4	0.7	52.2	49.3
Tasha Chudy	F	17	22.2	6.1	5.1	1.4	0.4	0.4	2.2	5.8	5.4	12	17	0.7	1.3	38.8	0.0	75.7	0.55	45.5	38.8
Maddison Krug	F	29	23.8	3.8	7.3	1.1	0.9	1.3	1.1	3.1	10.2	-96	28	-3.4	-6.0	49.5	0	59.4	-2.67	51.9	49.5
Rosie Scognamiglio	G	30	19.1	3.3	2.1	0.9	0.9	0.1	0.9	3.9	2.5	-48	29	-1.7	-3.6	30.8	29.3	100.0	-1.81	41.6	41.0
Haley Poser	G	27	14.5	3.0	1.2	1.5	0.6	0.1	1.6	3.6	1.1	-109	26	-4.2	-12.1	22.4	21.4	75.0	-7.06	35.7	28.6
Emma Heaney	G	23	10.4	2.3	2.5	0.3	0.3	0.3	0.6	1.8	3.3	-24	20	-1.2	-4.2	48.8	0.0	72.2	-0.74	54.2	48.8
Brynn Beffert	F	10	7.2	1.5	2.5	0.3	0.1	0.1	0.6	1.3	2.6	35	10	3.5	20.9	46.2	0	75.0	1.97	50.8	46.2
Jordyn Mays	F	7	5.6	0.9	1.6	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.7	2.0	-10	6	-1.7	-14.3	40.0	0	100.0	-2.8	51.0	40.0
Sofia Valente	F	13	5.2	0.6	0.4	0.1	0.1	0.0	0.0	0.5	0.7	26	13	2.0	16.0	33.3	50.0	100.0	1.9	58.1	50.0
Kay Donahue	G	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Emma Shields	F	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
M. Urmuleviciute	F	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2025-2026 Shot Zones

1633 located field-goal attempts in 30 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Teresa KiewietHaylie AdamskiTalia ZurinskasSauda Ntaconayigize

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	94-164	57.3	188	Talia Zurinskas 20% (38 pts)	Teresa Kiewiet 18% (34 pts)	Talia Zurinskas 27% (19 misses)	Teresa Kiewiet 20% (14 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	198-477	41.5	396	Teresa Kiewiet 29% (114 pts)	Talia Zurinskas 17% (66 pts)	Talia Zurinskas 27% (76 misses)	Teresa Kiewiet 20% (57 misses)
Mid-range left	53-164	32.3	106	Teresa Kiewiet 47% (50 pts)	Talia Zurinskas 28% (30 pts)	Teresa Kiewiet 41% (46 misses)	Talia Zurinskas 23% (26 misses)
Mid-range center	20-51	39.2	40	Teresa Kiewiet 50% (20 pts)	Sauda Ntaconayigize 15% (6 pts)	Teresa Kiewiet 32% (10 misses)	Talia Zurinskas 19% (6 misses)
Mid-range right	46-145	31.7	92	Teresa Kiewiet 50% (46 pts)	Talia Zurinskas 28% (26 pts)	Teresa Kiewiet 34% (34 misses)	Talia Zurinskas 20% (20 misses)
Left corner 3	22-78	28.2	66	Haylie Adamski 36% (24 pts)	Sauda Ntaconayigize 32% (21 pts)	Haylie Adamski 29% (16 misses)	Sauda Ntaconayigize 27% (15 misses)
Right corner 3	21-41	51.2	63	Sauda Ntaconayigize 33% (21 pts)	Haylie Adamski 29% (18 pts)	Teresa Kiewiet 25% (5 misses)	Haylie Adamski 20% (4 misses)
Above-break 3 left	83-243	34.2	249	Haylie Adamski 27% (66 pts)	Sauda Ntaconayigize 22% (54 pts)	Haylie Adamski 28% (44 misses)	Sauda Ntaconayigize 21% (34 misses)
Above-break 3 center	30-93	32.3	90	Teresa Kiewiet 33% (30 pts)	Haylie Adamski 23% (21 pts)	Talia Zurinskas 22% (14 misses)	Haylie Adamski 19% (12 misses)
Above-break 3 right	60-177	33.9	180	Haylie Adamski 37% (66 pts)	Sauda Ntaconayigize 25% (45 pts)	Haylie Adamski 27% (32 misses)	Sauda Ntaconayigize 17% (20 misses)