Indiana
2011 Team Stats (12 games)
65.1
PPG
68.9
Opp
-3.8
Margin
44.8%
FG%
34.6%
3P%
75.4%
FT%
32.0
RPG
10.5
APG
13.3
TO
-
Est. poss./game
71.4
Adj PPG
64.1
Adj Opp PPG
#74
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 966 (#186) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 994 (#173) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 897 (#301) | HCA +91 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +8.2 (#72) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +6.5 (#87) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.568 (#131) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.820 (#71) | AdjNet +13.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.824 (#69) | AdjNet +13.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.660 (#74) | AdjO 71.4 | AdjD 64.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.526 (#142) | AdjO 67.4 | AdjD 66.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.598 (#113) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.571 (#122) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 963 (#192) | RD 140 | GP 30 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Christian Watford
|
F | 16 | 30.8 | 16.5 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 7.4 | 14.4 | 41 | 25 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 41.5 | 41.0 | 81.5 | 3.14 | 90.0 | 48.3 |
Verdell Jones
|
G | 15 | 29.8 | 13.4 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 6.9 | 11.3 | -19 | 23 | -0.8 | -1.4 | 46.2 | 43.5 | 64.9 | 0.15 | 83.6 | 51.0 |
Jordan Hulls
|
G | 18 | 32.8 | 11.6 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 6.7 | 9.1 | 22 | 27 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 45.5 | 37.5 | 94.7 | 3.03 | 80.4 | 54.1 |
Maurice Creek
|
G | 6 | 18.0 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 27 | 13 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 44.4 | 31.6 | 100.0 | -2.86 | 68.1 | 55.6 |
Victor Oladipo
|
G | 18 | 17.9 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 6.2 | 52 | 27 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 57.9 | 27.3 | 60.9 | 3.24 | 83.4 | 60.5 |
Will Sheehey
|
F | 18 | 15.4 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 4.1 | -35 | 24 | -1.5 | -4.4 | 43.1 | 30.8 | 83.3 | -2.59 | 76.4 | 47.1 |
Jeremiah Rivers
|
G | 18 | 23.9 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 6.8 | -14 | 26 | -0.5 | -1.1 | 36.8 | 22.2 | 72.2 | -1.59 | 87.1 | 39.5 |
Derek Elston
|
F | 18 | 14.7 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 5.4 | 53 | 25 | 2.1 | 6.4 | 44.7 | 16.7 | 88.9 | 1.36 | 82.2 | 46.1 |
Matt Roth
|
G | 16 | 8.5 | 3.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 47 | 23 | 2.0 | 11.1 | 31.0 | 30.8 | 100.0 | 2.36 | 95.4 | 44.8 |
Tom Pritchard
|
F | 18 | 20.1 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 6.1 | 29 | 26 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 62.1 | 0 | 40.0 | 0.97 | 84.9 | 62.1 |
Taylor Wayer
|
G | 3 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0 | 8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | -1.31 | 150.0 | 150.0 |
Daniel Moore
|
G | 14 | 6.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 37 | 21 | 1.8 | 12.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 0.26 | 78.1 | 0.0 |
Kory Barnett
|
F | 5 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 14 | 10 | 1.4 | 23.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -0.48 | 20.5 | 0.0 |
Jeff Howard
|
F | 3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | -1.37 | 56.8 | 0 |
Bobby Capobianco
|
F | 14 | 5.8 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.4 | -24 | 22 | -1.1 | -7.9 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | -4.1 | 113.6 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG