Indiana State
2026 Team Stats (30 games)
73.2
PPG
74.8
Opp
-1.6
Margin
46.3%
FG%
31.5%
3P%
67.4%
FT%
34.9
RPG
17.6
APG
14.0
TO
79.2
Pace
73.8
AdjO
76.1
AdjD
#197
Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 816 (#320) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 902 (#253) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 896 (#673) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -2.2 (#196) | HCA +2.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +10.8 (#221) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.370 (#252) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.245 (#261) | NetEff -9.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.439 (#186) | AdjNet -2.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.440 (#186) | AdjNet -2.1 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.447 (#197) | AdjO 73.8 | AdjD 76.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.481 (#331) | AdjO 71.3 | AdjD 72.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.650 (#251) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.602 (#259) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 912 (#437) | RD 155 | GP 30 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ian Scott
|
- | 30 | 29.8 | 13.4 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 8.0 | 14.4 | -19 | -0.8 | -2.5 | 63.6 | 38.8 | 71.6 | -0.34 | 69.9 | 67.6 |
C. Wagner
|
G | 30 | 28.6 | 11.5 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 10.5 | 6.4 | -40 | -1.7 | -5.7 | 36.8 | 33.9 | 90.2 | -0.49 | 51.8 | 48.9 |
S. Young
|
G | 28 | 23.5 | 10.1 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 9.1 | 3.5 | 82 | 4.1 | 10.1 | 39.2 | 33.3 | 86.4 | 0.05 | 51.6 | 48.0 |
D. Vorst
|
C | 20 | 21.9 | 8.6 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 8.9 | -55 | -3.1 | -11.7 | 56.6 | 42.1 | 53.8 | -0.18 | 60.6 | 60.4 |
M. Harding
|
C | 21 | 21.2 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 6.2 | 4.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 51.1 | 34.9 | 56.5 | -0.33 | 57.4 | 56.9 |
X. Hall
|
- | 30 | 27.9 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 12 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 43.0 | 21.7 | 75.0 | -0.06 | 51.9 | 47.7 |
B. Alocen
|
G | 30 | 21.4 | 6.4 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 5.3 | 5.3 | -23 | -1.1 | -8.5 | 37.5 | 30.4 | 78.7 | -0.58 | 53.1 | 48.4 |
Jo Van Buggenhout
|
- | 24 | 20.9 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 4.5 | -77 | -4.1 | -22.3 | 39.2 | 28.6 | 62.5 | -0.42 | 48.5 | 46.9 |
Enel St. Bernard
|
- | 29 | 17.7 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 70.0 | 0.0 | 40.3 | - | 64.8 | 70.0 |
J. Walker
|
G | 10 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 56.2 | 25.0 | 80.0 | -0.28 | 65.9 | 62.5 |
Z. Greene
|
- | 4 | 7.2 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 30.0 | 12.5 | 50.0 | -0.08 | 36.8 | 35.0 |
Sivert Nordheim
|
- | 17 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 10 | 0.9 | 44.8 | 35.5 | 16.7 | 80.0 | -0.19 | 42.2 | 38.7 |
H. Harding
|
- | 10 | 6.1 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 2 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.11 | 77.8 | 77.8 |
C. Bean
|
- | 16 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | -7 | -0.8 | -28.1 | 47.1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | -0.1 | 55.9 | 58.8 |
C. Huttenlocker
|
- | 9 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
Martin Kaupanger
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG