🐻⬇️🏀

Grambling

Also known as: Grambling Tigers
Program History

2013 Team Stats (2 games)

51.5
PPG
76.4
Opp
-26.7
Margin
37.4%
FG%
27.8%
3P%
50.0%
FT%
34.0
RPG
10.0
APG
19.5
TO
78.7
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1032 (#320) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1002 (#371) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 809 (#588) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +8.8 (#437) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -20.6 (#549) HCA +3.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -37.5 More → 0.008 (#304) NetEff -37.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 51.1 | AdjD 70.6 More → 0.144 (#592) AdjO 51.1 | AdjD 70.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.061 (#586) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.065 (#592) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 153 | GP 28 More → 509 (#592) RD 153 | GP 28

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
T. Rose T. Rose G 28 34.9 14.1 3.4 1.0 0.5 0.0 2.4 4.1 12.5 -465 -19.4 -25.7 35.7 37.5 77.3 -1.08 158.4 46.1
B. Purvis B. Purvis G-F 20 26.7 6.1 4.7 0.9 0.5 0.0 2.8 1.5 7.9 -318 -15.9 -24.4 40.0 30.0 25.0 -1.87 192.1 45.0
D. Hobbs D. Hobbs G 10 24.0 5.9 1.5 2.8 0.4 0.1 3.6 1.7 5.4 -188 -18.8 -41.2 17.6 12.5 71.4 -1.6 146.9 20.6
P. Roberson P. Roberson C 26 19.2 5.0 4.3 0.3 0.3 1.2 1.2 2.3 7.7 -293 -11.7 -22.3 36.7 0.0 55.0 -1.85 95.2 36.7
D. Wheeler D. Wheeler F 25 24.2 5.0 4.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 1.4 1.3 8.3 -315 -13.1 -24.9 50.0 50.0 87.5 -2.2 176.0 51.6
J. Dobbs J. Dobbs G 3 13.0 5.0 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 2.3 5.7 -1.3 - - - 35.3 42.9 0 0.16 44.1 44.1
B. Dorsett B. Dorsett G 26 16.5 3.9 2.2 1.5 0.7 0.0 1.3 1.3 5.7 -294 -10.9 -25.7 26.5 15.4 42.9 -2.08 127.0 29.4
S. Danridge S. Danridge C 26 17.3 3.8 2.7 0.4 0.2 0.7 1.3 0.9 5.6 - - - 52.2 0 33.3 - 173.3 52.2
R. Higgins R. Higgins G-F 23 15.0 3.8 2.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 1.5 1.7 3.5 -252 -10.5 -24.4 47.4 25.0 66.7 -1.63 104.9 48.7
D. Copeland D. Copeland G 22 27.0 3.5 2.7 3.2 0.6 0.0 2.5 1.3 6.2 -267 -12.1 -23.4 46.4 40.0 56.2 -1.44 108.4 50.0
W. Hornsby W. Hornsby G 22 20.0 3.5 1.9 2.2 0.6 0.1 2.6 1.5 4.2 -314 -14.3 -26.7 21.2 20.0 63.6 -2.09 101.7 25.8
E. Garcia E. Garcia - 2 21.0 3.5 2.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 3.5 0.0 4.0 -47 -9.4 -20.1 0 0 0 -0.49 0 0
C. Cobbins C. Cobbins G 25 9.4 2.6 1.6 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.8 3.6 -90 -3.6 -13.4 45.0 20.0 75.0 -0.05 149.4 47.5
B. Turner B. Turner F 23 7.9 1.3 1.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 2.4 -76 -2.4 -5.0 16.7 0 25.0 -0.19 112.6 16.7

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG