🐻⬇️🏀

Florida

Also known as: Florida Gators, Florida
Program History

2013 Team Stats (32 games)

71.2
PPG
54.4
Opp
+17.0
Margin
47.8%
FG%
37.9%
3P%
68.6%
FT%
34.8
RPG
14.9
APG
11.3
TO
72.8
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1792 (#15) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1553 (#30) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 1083 (#66) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +40.3 (#10) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +27.2 (#4) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.935 (#1) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +26.7 More → 0.960 (#6) NetEff +26.7
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +24.1 More → 0.942 (#4) AdjNet +24.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +24.4 More → 0.944 (#4) AdjNet +24.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 53.4 More → 0.791 (#4) AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 53.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.949 (#3) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.936 (#4) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 89 | GP 37 More → 1297 (#25) RD 89 | GP 37

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-11 vs Alabama State Hornets W 84 - 35
2012-11-14 vs Wisconsin Badgers W 74 - 56
2012-11-18 vs Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders W 66 - 45
2012-11-20 vs Savannah State Tigers W 58 - 40
2012-11-23 vs UCF Knights W 79 - 66
2012-11-29 vs Marquette Golden Eagles W 82 - 49
2012-12-05 @ Florida State Seminoles W 72 - 47
2012-12-15 @ Arizona Wildcats L 64 - 65
2012-12-19 vs SE Louisiana Lions W 82 - 43
2012-12-22 @ Kansas State Wildcats L 61 - 67
2012-12-29 vs Air Force Falcons W 78 - 61
2013-01-06 @ Yale Bulldogs W 79 - 58
2013-01-09 vs Georgia Bulldogs W 77 - 44
2013-01-12 @ LSU Tigers W 74 - 52
2013-01-17 @ Texas A&M Aggies W 68 - 47
2013-01-19 vs Missouri Tigers W 83 - 52
2013-01-23 @ Georgia Bulldogs W 64 - 47
2013-01-26 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs W 82 - 47
2013-01-30 vs South Carolina Gamecocks W 75 - 36
2013-02-02 vs Ole Miss Rebels W 78 - 64
2013-02-05 @ Arkansas Razorbacks L 69 - 80
2013-02-09 vs Mississippi State Bulldogs W 83 - 58
2013-02-12 vs Kentucky Wildcats W 69 - 52
2013-02-16 @ Auburn Tigers W 83 - 52
2013-02-19 @ Missouri Tigers L 60 - 63
2013-02-23 vs Arkansas Razorbacks W 71 - 54
2013-02-26 @ Tennessee Volunteers L 58 - 64
2013-03-02 vs Alabama Crimson Tide W 64 - 52
2013-03-06 vs Vanderbilt Commodores W 66 - 40
2013-03-09 @ Kentucky Wildcats L 57 - 61
2013-03-15 vs LSU Tigers W 80 - 58
2013-03-16 vs Alabama Crimson Tide W 61 - 51
2013-03-17 vs Ole Miss Rebels L 63 - 66
2013-03-22 vs Northwestern State Demons W 79 - 47
2013-03-24 vs Minnesota Golden Gophers W 78 - 64
2013-03-29 vs Florida Gulf Coast Eagles W 62 - 50
2013-03-31 vs Michigan Wolverines L 59 - 79

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
M. Rosario M. Rosario G 36 29.5 12.5 2.6 2.0 0.9 0.0 1.8 9.0 7.3 333 9.2 14.5 45.1 36.6 82.2 1.09 63.2 53.7
E. Murphy E. Murphy F-C 36 26.4 12.2 5.5 1.4 0.6 0.7 1.4 7.6 11.4 345 9.6 16.9 50.9 45.7 84.6 1.92 75.3 62.5
K. Boynton K. Boynton G 37 31.6 12.0 3.0 2.7 0.8 0.1 1.3 8.9 8.5 447 12.1 16.9 39.3 32.3 81.2 2.31 60.0 48.9
P. Young P. Young C 37 26.5 10.1 6.3 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.5 6.3 11.9 410 11.1 18.8 58.5 0 51.3 2.64 65.3 58.5
S. Wilbekin S. Wilbekin G 35 31.9 9.1 2.9 5.0 1.5 0.1 2.1 6.5 10.0 429 12.3 16.9 46.0 37.2 75.4 2.2 63.5 53.1
C. Prather C. Prather F 29 17.1 6.2 3.7 1.0 0.9 0.6 1.0 3.9 7.3 121 4.2 8.7 62.3 28.6 63.3 0.03 71.1 63.2
M. Frazier II M. Frazier II G 36 18.0 5.6 3.1 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.8 3.4 6.1 -9 -0.6 -9.4 44.3 46.5 88.5 0.42 75.7 63.1
W. Yeguete W. Yeguete F 31 20.9 5.5 5.8 1.0 1.2 0.3 1.3 3.2 9.2 339 10.9 19.5 57.0 25.0 56.6 2.17 63.7 57.5
B. Ogbueze B. Ogbueze G 23 4.7 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.5 15 0.7 4.3 31.8 20.0 36.4 -0.14 35.4 34.1
D. Walker D. Walker F 25 4.0 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.8 87 3.6 15.7 19.0 14.3 78.6 0.37 36.8 21.4
J. Kurtz J. Kurtz F 20 2.0 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.1 2 0.1 1.0 66.7 100.0 50.0 -0.28 87.2 75.0
D. Graham D. Graham G 23 3.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.0 20 0.9 6.6 27.8 10.0 0 0.24 30.6 30.6

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG