Fairfield Stags
2026 Team Stats (33 games)
Model Outputs
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1377 (#26) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1289 (#27) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1171 (#12) | HCA +106 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +13.0 (#62) | HCA +2.4 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +14.5 (#56) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.963 (#7) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 0.963 (#7) | NetEff +26.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.910 (#60) | AdjNet +20.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.912 (#60) | AdjNet +20.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.774 (#57) | AdjO 72.6 | AdjD 59.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.800 (#22) | AdjO 70.1 | AdjD 54.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.838 (#49) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.842 (#43) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1264 (#32) | RD 123 | GP 33 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kaety L'Amoreaux
|
G | 33 | 31.8 | 17.3 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 12.1 | 14.2 | 517 | 27 | 19.1 | 25.6 | 46.4 | 36.5 | 88.7 | 4.59 | 61.8 | 55.6 |
Meghan Andersen
|
F | 33 | 29.8 | 16.1 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 13.5 | 9.8 | 482 | 27 | 17.9 | 25.6 | 44.6 | 39.8 | 88.9 | 3.22 | 56.9 | 54.5 |
Jillian Huerter
|
G | 31 | 25.4 | 9.3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 6.7 | 371 | 25 | 14.8 | 24.8 | 41.9 | 43.6 | 93.1 | 0.67 | 60.1 | 57.5 |
Cyanne Coe
|
F | 32 | 21.8 | 8.9 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 10.2 | 388 | 27 | 14.4 | 27.4 | 64.2 | 0.0 | 39.1 | 4.17 | 61.6 | 64.2 |
Janelle Brown
|
G | 27 | 21.9 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 218 | 21 | 10.4 | 20.5 | 41.7 | 32.8 | 63.9 | -1.21 | 51.6 | 49.3 |
Christina Pham
|
G | 28 | 13.2 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 103 | 21 | 4.9 | 15.0 | 36.6 | 37.5 | 66.7 | -1.4 | 53.1 | 52.7 |
Sydni Scott
|
G | 33 | 20.4 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 269 | 27 | 10.0 | 20.7 | 37.2 | 35.6 | 87.5 | -0.18 | 54.1 | 53.0 |
Lauren Beach
|
F | 27 | 16.3 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 133 | 21 | 6.3 | 16.8 | 70.9 | 0.0 | 72.0 | 0.01 | 72.7 | 70.9 |
Milou van Vliet
|
F | 23 | 14.1 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 122 | 18 | 6.8 | 19.8 | 43.0 | 23.7 | 33.3 | -1.11 | 48.1 | 48.7 |
Alli Campbell
|
G | 24 | 14.2 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 119 | 21 | 5.7 | 16.4 | 31.7 | 27.8 | 94.4 | -3.85 | 43.7 | 35.7 |
Keyarah Gregory
|
G | 26 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 52 | 23 | 2.3 | 12.7 | 43.6 | 38.9 | 73.7 | -2.33 | 58.1 | 52.6 |
Julia Karpell
|
G | 19 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.3 | -8 | 17 | -0.5 | -4.6 | 36.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | -3.8 | 55.1 | 52.0 |
Jalyn Sackrider
|
F | 10 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 9 | 8 | 1.1 | 12.5 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 83.3 | -2.08 | 45.8 | 20.0 |
Casey Prior
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Selen Yusan
|
F | 15 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | -0.1 | -15 | 12 | -1.2 | -15.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -4.37 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2025-2026 Shot Zones
1969 located field-goal attempts in 33 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Meghan AndersenKaety L'AmoreauxJillian HuerterCyanne CoeChristina Pham
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 345-566 | 61.0 | 690 | Cyanne Coe 28% (194 pts) | Meghan Andersen 21% (146 pts) | Meghan Andersen 26% (58 misses) | Cyanne Coe 20% (45 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 156-333 | 46.8 | 312 | Kaety L'Amoreaux 24% (76 pts) | Cyanne Coe 21% (64 pts) | Meghan Andersen 27% (48 misses) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 17% (30 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 13-32 | 40.6 | 26 | Meghan Andersen 31% (8 pts) | Jillian Huerter 23% (6 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 26% (5 misses) | Jillian Huerter 21% (4 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 4-8 | 50.0 | 8 | Meghan Andersen 75% (6 pts) | Milou van Vliet 25% (2 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 50% (2 misses) | Alli Campbell 25% (1 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 7-27 | 25.9 | 14 | Kaety L'Amoreaux 57% (8 pts) | Jalyn Sackrider 14% (2 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 30% (6 misses) | Jillian Huerter 20% (4 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 35-103 | 34.0 | 105 | Christina Pham 23% (24 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 23% (24 pts) | Meghan Andersen 21% (14 misses) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 13% (9 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 40-101 | 39.6 | 120 | Meghan Andersen 32% (39 pts) | Jillian Huerter 18% (21 pts) | Jillian Huerter 28% (17 misses) | Meghan Andersen 18% (11 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 110-309 | 35.6 | 330 | Meghan Andersen 19% (63 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 17% (57 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 19% (38 misses) | Meghan Andersen 19% (38 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 70-197 | 35.5 | 210 | Jillian Huerter 30% (63 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 23% (48 pts) | Meghan Andersen 30% (38 misses) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 20% (25 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 110-293 | 37.5 | 330 | Meghan Andersen 26% (87 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 22% (72 pts) | Kaety L'Amoreaux 26% (47 misses) | Meghan Andersen 17% (32 misses) |