๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Davidson

Also known as: Davidson Wildcats, Davidson
Program History

2022 Team Stats (33 games)

75.6
PPG
66.1
Opp
+9.5
Margin
48.0%
FG%
38.8%
3P%
76.1%
FT%
34.1
RPG
14.7
APG
9.8
TO
-
Est. poss./game
74.8
Adj PPG
64.6
Adj Opp PPG
#50
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2021-2022
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1264 (#25) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1263 (#22) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +78 elo More โ†’ 1099 (#54) HCA +78 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.2 More โ†’ +10.8 (#55) HCA +2.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.1 More โ†’ +11.7 (#41) HCA +2.1
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.801 (#31) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +15.7 More โ†’ 0.859 (#51) AdjNet +15.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +15.7 More โ†’ 0.860 (#51) AdjNet +15.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 74.8 | AdjD 64.6 More โ†’ 0.718 (#50) AdjO 74.8 | AdjD 64.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 73.6 | AdjD 65.6 More โ†’ 0.674 (#33) AdjO 73.6 | AdjD 65.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.774 (#44) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.767 (#40) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 114 | GP 33 More โ†’ 1248 (#28) RD 114 | GP 33

2022 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2021-11-09 vs Delaware Blue Hens W 93 - 71
2021-11-13 @ San Francisco Dons L 60 - 65
2021-11-18 @ New Mexico State Aggies L 64 - 75
2021-11-19 @ Pennsylvania Quakers W 72 - 60
2021-11-21 @ East Carolina Pirates W 76 - 67
2021-11-27 vs Robert Morris Colonials W 88 - 70
2021-11-30 @ Charlotte 49ers W 75 - 58
2021-12-04 vs William & Mary Tribe W 70 - 46
2021-12-12 @ Northeastern Huskies W 79 - 69
2021-12-18 vs Radford Highlanders W 74 - 54
2021-12-21 @ Alabama Crimson Tide W 79 - 78
2021-12-22 vs Johnson & Wales-Charlotte JOHNSON & WALES-CHARLOTTE W 106 - 64
2021-12-30 vs Duquesne Dukes - Postponed
2022-01-02 @ VCU Rams - Postponed
2022-01-05 @ Saint Joseph's Hawks W 88 - 73
2022-01-08 vs Rhode Island Rams W 72 - 68
2022-01-11 vs Massachusetts Minutemen W 77 - 67
2022-01-14 @ Richmond Spiders W 87 - 84
2022-01-18 @ VCU Rams W 63 - 61
2022-01-22 @ Fordham Rams W 69 - 66
2022-01-26 vs VCU Rams L 68 - 70
2022-01-29 vs La Salle Explorers W 77 - 69
2022-02-01 @ St. Bonaventure Bonnies W 81 - 76
2022-02-05 @ George Washington Revolutionaries W 78 - 73
2022-02-09 vs Saint Joseph's Hawks W 73 - 67
2022-02-12 @ Rhode Island Rams L 65 - 72
2022-02-14 vs Duquesne Dukes W 72 - 61
2022-02-19 vs Saint Louis Billikens W 79 - 58
2022-02-23 @ Duquesne Dukes W 74 - 50
2022-02-26 vs Fordham Rams W 66 - 45
2022-03-02 vs George Mason Patriots W 73 - 62
2022-03-05 @ Dayton Flyers L 76 - 82
2022-03-11 vs Fordham Rams W 74 - 56
2022-03-12 vs Saint Louis Billikens W 84 - 69
2022-03-13 vs Richmond Spiders L 62 - 64
2022-03-18 @ Michigan State Spartans L 73 - 74

2022 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Foster Loyer Foster Loyer - 29 30.1 16.2 3.2 3.3 0.8 0.0 1.7 10.6 11.2 211 26 8.1 11.4 45.1 43.8 93.7 -1.92 64.7 57.1
Hyunjung Lee Hyunjung Lee G 34 32.1 15.8 6.0 1.9 0.7 0.3 1.5 11.3 11.8 342 30 11.4 14.6 47.4 38.1 77.7 5.93 61.5 57.8
Luka Brajkovic Luka Brajkovic F 33 29.3 14.3 7.2 2.5 0.3 1.1 1.6 9.9 13.8 297 30 9.9 13.5 58.2 41.5 64.0 1.89 64.4 63.4
Michael Jones Michael Jones - 33 31.1 12.0 3.6 2.0 1.0 0.3 1.1 8.2 9.5 329 30 11.0 14.3 47.1 42.9 85.5 4.64 64.2 59.7
Sam Mennenga Sam Mennenga - 34 25.7 8.4 5.3 1.5 0.4 0.4 1.1 6.2 8.5 235 30 7.8 12.5 51.9 46.7 62.5 1.17 57.4 55.2
Grant Huffman Grant Huffman G 31 20.1 4.2 2.3 1.5 0.8 0.0 1.0 3.5 4.5 98 29 3.4 7.0 46.7 37.1 54.5 -1.89 53.9 52.8
Des Watson Des Watson - 34 12.6 2.9 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.8 3.5 0.9 -56 30 -1.9 -6.0 33.3 18.4 73.3 -6.76 38.7 36.2
Nelson Boachie-Yiadom Nelson Boachie-Yiadom - 34 17.1 2.2 2.2 1.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.8 4.2 71 30 2.4 5.8 49.2 11.1 65.0 0.39 53.0 50.0
Chris Ford Chris Ford - 8 3.4 1.5 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 1.6 -16 6 -2.7 -56.2 60.0 0 0 -3.34 60.0 60.0
Emory Lanier Emory Lanier - 16 6.2 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.6 1.0 1 13 0.1 0.6 23.1 6.7 66.7 -1.47 33.6 25.0
David Kristensen David Kristensen F 18 4.1 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.9 1 17 0.1 0.8 55.6 20.0 50.0 -0.57 58.3 58.3
Styrmir Thrastarson Styrmir Thrastarson G 12 3.6 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.2 -26 12 -2.2 -42.3 40.0 33.3 50.0 -4.09 51.8 50.0
Drew Dibble Drew Dibble G 8 2.5 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.1 -9 7 -1.3 -31.8 75.0 75.0 0 -2.5 112.5 112.5
Ben Craig Ben Craig G 8 2.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 -9 7 -1.3 -30.0 66.7 0 0 -2.43 66.7 66.7
Michael Katsock Michael Katsock G 6 1.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 -0.7 -19 5 -3.8 -113.7 0.0 0.0 0 -3.89 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2021-2022 Shot Zones

341 located field-goal attempts in 6 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Brajkovic32% Brajkovic33% Mennenga24% Loyer46% Jones36%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Brajkovic21% Brajkovic29% Mennenga25% Loyer100% Loyer27% Jones67% Lee33% Loyer33% Loyer38% Lee33%
Misses: who misses most here

Luka BrajkovicHyunjung LeeMichael JonesSam MennengaFoster Loyer

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 78-125 62.4 156 Luka Brajkovic 32% (50 pts) Sam Mennenga 21% (32 pts) Luka Brajkovic 21% (10 misses) Foster Loyer 17% (8 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 24-55 43.6 48 Luka Brajkovic 33% (16 pts) Michael Jones 25% (12 pts) Luka Brajkovic 29% (9 misses) Sam Mennenga 23% (7 misses)
Mid-range left 25-37 67.6 50 Sam Mennenga 24% (12 pts) Foster Loyer 20% (10 pts) Sam Mennenga 25% (3 misses) Des Watson 17% (2 misses)
Mid-range center 13-16 81.2 26 Foster Loyer 46% (12 pts) Luka Brajkovic 31% (8 pts) Foster Loyer 100% (3 misses) -
Mid-range right 22-33 66.7 44 Michael Jones 36% (16 pts) Hyunjung Lee 32% (14 pts) Foster Loyer 27% (3 misses) Des Watson 18% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 0-3 0.0 0 - - Michael Jones 67% (2 misses) Hyunjung Lee 33% (1 misses)
Right corner 3 0-6 0.0 0 - - Hyunjung Lee 33% (2 misses) Sam Mennenga 33% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 left 0-21 0.0 0 - - Foster Loyer 33% (7 misses) Hyunjung Lee 29% (6 misses)
Above-break 3 center 0-21 0.0 0 - - Foster Loyer 38% (8 misses) Hyunjung Lee 29% (6 misses)
Above-break 3 right 0-24 0.0 0 - - Hyunjung Lee 33% (8 misses) Michael Jones 29% (7 misses)