🐻⬇️🏀

Columbia Lions

Also known as: Columbia Lions
Program History

2013 Team Stats (6 games)

57.7
PPG
60.5
Opp
+1.9
Margin
38.7%
FG%
28.9%
3P%
68.5%
FT%
32.2
RPG
9.7
APG
9.5
TO
69.8
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1374 (#119) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1174 (#252) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 927 (#520) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +18.1 (#272) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +6.7 (#200) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.385 (#74) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -6.6 More → 0.316 (#139) NetEff -6.6
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -17.9 More → 0.113 (#105) AdjNet -17.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -18.1 More → 0.110 (#105) AdjNet -18.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 59.7 | AdjD 59.1 More → 0.513 (#197) AdjO 59.7 | AdjD 59.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.575 (#233) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.548 (#235) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 150 | GP 28 More → 878 (#459) RD 150 | GP 28

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-10 @ Furman Paladins W 68 - 47
2012-11-13 vs Haverford Fords W 74 - 40
2012-11-17 vs Marist Red Foxes L 62 - 67
2012-11-20 @ Villanova Wildcats W 75 - 57
2012-11-23 vs Wayland Baptist University Pioneers W 75 - 63
2012-11-24 @ San Francisco Dons L 59 - 79
2012-11-28 @ Long Island University Sharks L 61 - 70
2012-12-01 vs Bucknell Bison L 57 - 65
2012-12-09 @ American University Eagles W 54 - 42
2012-12-22 vs Elon Phoenix L 69 - 70
2012-12-29 vs Manhattan Jaspers W 69 - 58
2013-01-02 vs Colgate Raiders W 66 - 59
2013-01-05 @ Army Black Knights W 64 - 52
2013-01-08 @ Holy Cross Crusaders L 69 - 78
2013-01-19 @ Cornell Big Red W 67 - 58
2013-01-26 vs Cornell Big Red L 63 - 66
2013-02-01 @ Pennsylvania Quakers L 58 - 62
2013-02-02 @ Princeton Tigers L 66 - 72
2013-02-08 vs Dartmouth Big Green L 57 - 60
2013-02-10 vs Harvard Crimson W 78 - 63
2013-02-15 @ Brown Bears L 55 - 58
2013-02-16 @ Yale Bulldogs L 56 - 75
2013-02-22 vs Princeton Tigers L 40 - 65
2013-02-23 vs Pennsylvania Quakers W 58 - 41
2013-03-01 vs Yale Bulldogs W 59 - 46
2013-03-02 vs Brown Bears L 58 - 61
2013-03-08 @ Harvard Crimson L 51 - 56
2013-03-09 @ Dartmouth Big Green L 58 - 64

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
B. Barbour B. Barbour G 27 32.6 12.1 2.3 4.0 1.6 0.1 1.4 3.8 14.9 17 0.6 0.8 35.3 25.7 86.5 -0.18 130.9 39.7
G. Mullins G. Mullins G 25 28.1 9.7 3.2 1.6 1.0 0.2 1.5 3.0 11.2 33 1.3 1.9 44.0 38.1 87.5 0.32 147.5 54.7
A. Rosenberg A. Rosenberg F 28 27.0 9.5 4.2 1.9 0.7 0.1 1.9 3.1 11.5 51 1.8 3.0 33.7 24.1 70.5 0.5 125.8 37.8
S. Frankoski S. Frankoski G 27 21.6 8.9 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.0 1.1 3.0 6.7 84 3.1 5.6 45.0 47.9 80.0 0.54 146.0 59.4
M. Cisco M. Cisco C 28 23.6 8.1 5.7 0.8 0.4 0.7 1.1 3.0 11.6 66 2.4 4.3 41.0 0 60.0 0.7 124.2 41.0
M. Lo M. Lo G 24 20.0 6.2 1.8 1.2 0.8 0.4 1.0 2.2 7.2 -20 -0.8 -1.9 48.1 33.3 66.7 -0.38 134.7 55.6
C. Osetkowski C. Osetkowski C 25 15.6 3.9 3.3 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.2 7.5 23 0.9 2.1 36.7 50.0 72.2 0.02 127.9 38.3
J. Daniels J. Daniels F 27 16.5 2.7 4.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 1.1 1.0 6.4 -23 -4.6 -18.4 51.9 0 66.7 -0.23 130.6 51.9
B. Gilson B. Gilson F 6 5.8 2.2 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 2.3 2 0.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 0 0.16 216.7 0.0
I. Cohen I. Cohen G 24 13.7 2.0 2.2 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.6 0.8 4.2 58 2.3 6.2 52.6 0.0 44.4 0.64 104.5 52.6
Z. En'Wezoh Z. En'Wezoh F 12 10.8 2.0 1.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.2 4.5 17 1.2 3.7 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.16 309.3 33.3
P. Quinn P. Quinn G 1 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
S. Scrivano S. Scrivano F 11 7.5 1.9 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.0 1.7 1 0.1 0.5 36.4 0 0 -0.03 95.5 36.4
N. Springwater N. Springwater G 14 5.4 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.7 4 0.2 1.4 50.0 60.0 0 -0.03 100.0 75.0
S. Ozeir S. Ozeir F 4 2.8 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.5 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 100.0 0.0
D. Kowalski D. Kowalski G 7 5.1 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.7 -22 -2.8 -14.7 0 0 0.0 -0.37 227.3 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG