Colgate Raiders
2023 Team Stats (22 games)
75.8
PPG
67.1
Opp
+7.4
Margin
50.7%
FG%
39.4%
3P%
63.5%
FT%
34.0
RPG
17.8
APG
9.3
TO
73.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1092 (#198) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1185 (#146) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +23.6 (#172) | HCA +2.8 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.760 (#37) | NetEff +10.8 |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | @ | Pennsylvania Quakers | L | 69 - 81 |
| 2022-11-27 | vs | Hartford Hawks | W | 92 - 58 |
| 2022-12-02 | @ | Auburn Tigers | L | 66 - 93 |
| 2023-01-02 | @ | Lehigh Mountain Hawks | W | 76 - 60 |
| 2023-01-05 | vs | Navy Midshipmen | W | 87 - 73 |
| 2023-01-09 | @ | Army Black Knights | W | 77 - 75 |
| 2023-01-11 | vs | Boston University Terriers | W | 77 - 71 |
| 2023-01-14 | vs | Bucknell Bison | W | 71 - 65 |
| 2023-01-18 | @ | Holy Cross Crusaders | W | 77 - 71 |
| 2023-01-21 | vs | American University Eagles | W | 62 - 61 |
| 2023-01-23 | @ | Boston University Terriers | W | 64 - 51 |
| 2023-01-28 | vs | Lafayette Leopards | W | 69 - 57 |
| 2023-01-30 | vs | Loyola Maryland Greyhounds | W | 76 - 63 |
| 2023-02-04 | @ | American University Eagles | L | 60 - 61 |
| 2023-02-08 | vs | Lehigh Mountain Hawks | W | 81 - 53 |
| 2023-02-25 | @ | Navy Midshipmen | W | 64 - 60 |
| 2023-03-02 | vs | Loyola Maryland Greyhounds | W | 92 - 73 |
| 2023-03-05 | vs | Army Black Knights | W | 91 - 74 |
| 2023-03-08 | vs | Lafayette Leopards | W | 79 - 61 |
| 2023-03-16 | @ | Texas Longhorns | L | 61 - 81 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Keegan Records
|
- | 20 | 23.9 | 13.9 | 6.2 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 8.1 | 14.8 | - | - | - | 67.7 | 50.0 | 57.1 | -0.33 | 76.1 | 68.6 |
B. Smith
|
- | 20 | 31.9 | 12.3 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 7.9 | 11.6 | 26 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 47.5 | 35.3 | 84.4 | 1.05 | 66.1 | 53.2 |
O. Lynch-Daniels
|
- | 20 | 32.5 | 11.7 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 7.8 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 51.9 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 71.8 | 64.4 |
T. Richardson
|
- | 20 | 35.0 | 11.7 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 10.2 | 12.8 | - | - | - | 39.2 | 22.7 | 49.3 | - | 49.9 | 43.4 |
Ryan Moffatt
|
- | 19 | 31.3 | 10.2 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 6.6 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 52.4 | 45.5 | 72.7 | -0.2 | 71.5 | 64.3 |
Jeff Woodward
|
- | 20 | 16.8 | 7.6 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 9.1 | - | - | - | 60.5 | 0 | 61.7 | - | 71.2 | 60.5 |
Chandler Baker
|
G | 20 | 11.8 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.1 | 1.9 | - | - | - | 33.9 | 24.1 | 100.0 | - | 61.1 | 39.5 |
Sam Thomson
|
F | 16 | 15.0 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 0.0 | 45.0 | - | 45.3 | 38.1 |
Nicolas Louis-Jacques
|
G | 18 | 5.5 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 54.5 | 50.0 |
Capitano, Alex
|
- | 7 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 64.4 | 33.3 |
B. Cummins
|
G | 6 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -6 | -0.5 | -1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.59 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG