Charleston
2021 Team Stats (1 games)
60.0
PPG
79.0
Opp
-19.0
Margin
40.0%
FG%
34.8%
3P%
40.0%
FT%
34.0
RPG
13.0
APG
15.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
66.7
Adj PPG
70.7
Adj Opp PPG
#228
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 881 (#234) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 915 (#239) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 970 (#220) | HCA +66 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -4.6 (#224) | HCA +1.9 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -4.2 (#223) | HCA +2.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.424 (#210) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.364 (#206) | AdjNet -4.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.363 (#206) | AdjNet -4.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.411 (#228) | AdjO 66.7 | AdjD 70.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.460 (#215) | AdjO 68.5 | AdjD 70.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.392 (#227) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.402 (#228) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 880 (#252) | RD 181 | GP 17 |
2021 Schedule & Results
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B. Galloway
|
- | 3 | 23.0 | 18.3 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 21.0 | - | - | - | - | 42.9 | 50.0 | 0.0 | -0.34 | 184.8 | 53.6 |
Z. Jasper
|
- | 17 | 32.9 | 15.9 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 18.1 | 45 | 17 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 39.1 | 25.9 | 75.0 | 1.22 | 190.0 | 44.5 |
P. Willis
|
G | 17 | 34.2 | 14.2 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 16.3 | 20 | 17 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 42.6 | 41.9 | 72.2 | 1.29 | 174.8 | 53.3 |
C. Copeland
|
- | 17 | 16.5 | 6.0 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 8.6 | 38 | 17 | 2.2 | 5.7 | 63.6 | 50.0 | 0 | 1.42 | 463.6 | 77.3 |
D. King
|
G | 16 | 12.4 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 6.5 | -49 | 16 | -3.1 | -11.2 | 53.8 | 25.0 | 50.0 | -6.15 | 145.7 | 55.8 |
O. Smart
|
C | 17 | 25.7 | 4.6 | 6.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 10.3 | 39 | 17 | 2.3 | 3.8 | 66.7 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.78 | 183.6 | 66.7 |
L. Edwards
|
F | 17 | 19.2 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 8.5 | 35 | 17 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 53.8 | 54.5 | 50.0 | -1.18 | 240.5 | 76.9 |
Keegan Harvey
|
F | 13 | 8.6 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 4.8 | -15 | 15 | -1.0 | -4.8 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 0.0 | -2.22 | 260.2 | 64.3 |
DA Houston
|
- | 10 | 9.7 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3.5 | -3 | 9 | -0.3 | -1.3 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | -1.86 | 195.6 | 30.0 |
S. Ndiaye
|
C | 4 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.38 | 0 | 0 |
D. Epps
|
G | 1 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | -5.0 | -4 | 17 | -0.2 | -0.4 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.39 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Brenden Tucker
|
- | 1 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | -6.0 | -7 | 17 | -0.4 | -0.7 | 12.5 | 0 | 0 | -1.77 | 12.5 | 12.5 |
J. Pizano-McInnis
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG