๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Charleston

Also known as: Charleston Cougars
Program History

2021 Team Stats (1 games)

60.0
PPG
79.0
Opp
-19.0
Margin
40.0%
FG%
34.8%
3P%
40.0%
FT%
34.0
RPG
13.0
APG
15.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
66.7
Adj PPG
70.7
Adj Opp PPG
#228
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2020-2021
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 881 (#234) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 915 (#239) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +66 elo More โ†’ 970 (#220) HCA +66 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.9 More โ†’ -4.6 (#224) HCA +1.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.0 More โ†’ -4.2 (#223) HCA +2.0
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.424 (#210) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -4.8 More โ†’ 0.364 (#206) AdjNet -4.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -4.9 More โ†’ 0.363 (#206) AdjNet -4.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 66.7 | AdjD 70.7 More โ†’ 0.411 (#228) AdjO 66.7 | AdjD 70.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.5 | AdjD 70.3 More โ†’ 0.460 (#215) AdjO 68.5 | AdjD 70.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.392 (#227) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.402 (#228) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 181 | GP 17 More โ†’ 880 (#252) RD 181 | GP 17

2021 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2020-11-25 @ North Carolina Tar Heels L 60 - 79
2020-11-28 vs Limestone Saints W 99 - 59
2020-12-02 vs Richmond Spiders - Preview
2020-12-05 vs Furman Paladins L 57 - 81
2020-12-09 vs Marshall Thundering Herd L 72 - 84
2020-12-11 vs South Carolina State Bulldogs W 90 - 63
2020-12-18 vs Western Carolina Catamounts L 70 - 76
2020-12-21 @ Georgia State Panthers L 55 - 72
2021-01-02 @ Delaware Blue Hens L 67 - 70
2021-01-03 @ Delaware Blue Hens W 66 - 59
2021-01-09 vs Drexel Dragons W 61 - 60
2021-01-10 vs Drexel Dragons W 73 - 68
2021-01-16 vs Northeastern Huskies L 62 - 67
2021-01-17 vs Northeastern Huskies L 66 - 68
2021-01-24 @ William & Mary Tribe - Postponed
2021-01-30 @ James Madison Dukes - Preview
2021-02-06 vs Towson Tigers W 90 - 88
2021-02-07 vs Towson Tigers W 66 - 53
2021-02-13 vs Elon Phoenix W 71 - 53
2021-02-14 vs Elon Phoenix L 55 - 66
2021-02-20 vs Columbus State Cougars W 86 - 83
2021-02-25 @ UNC Wilmington Seahawks - Preview
2021-03-07 vs Drexel Dragons L 75 - 80

2021 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
B. Galloway B. Galloway - 3 23.0 18.3 3.0 2.7 2.0 0.7 1.0 4.7 21.0 - - - - 42.9 50.0 0.0 -0.34 184.8 53.6
Z. Jasper Z. Jasper - 17 32.9 15.9 3.6 2.7 0.9 0.1 1.4 3.8 18.1 45 17 2.6 3.4 39.1 25.9 75.0 1.22 190.0 44.5
P. Willis P. Willis G 17 34.2 14.2 3.0 3.1 0.8 0.3 1.4 3.6 16.3 20 17 1.2 1.4 42.6 41.9 72.2 1.29 174.8 53.3
C. Copeland C. Copeland - 17 16.5 6.0 2.9 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.6 8.6 38 17 2.2 5.7 63.6 50.0 0 1.42 463.6 77.3
D. King D. King G 16 12.4 5.4 3.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 1.0 1.6 6.5 -49 16 -3.1 -11.2 53.8 25.0 50.0 -6.15 145.7 55.8
O. Smart O. Smart C 17 25.7 4.6 6.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 1.1 1.1 10.3 39 17 2.3 3.8 66.7 0 50.0 0.78 183.6 66.7
L. Edwards L. Edwards F 17 19.2 4.2 3.3 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.8 8.5 35 17 2.1 4.4 53.8 54.5 50.0 -1.18 240.5 76.9
Keegan Harvey Keegan Harvey F 13 8.6 3.2 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 4.8 -15 15 -1.0 -4.8 42.9 42.9 0.0 -2.22 260.2 64.3
DA Houston DA Houston - 10 9.7 2.3 1.4 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.5 3.5 -3 9 -0.3 -1.3 20.0 50.0 50.0 -1.86 195.6 30.0
S. Ndiaye S. Ndiaye C 4 4.0 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 - - - - 0 0 0 -1.38 0 0
D. Epps D. Epps G 1 17.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 -5.0 -4 17 -0.2 -0.4 25.0 0.0 0 -2.39 25.0 25.0
Brenden Tucker Brenden Tucker - 1 18.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 8.0 -6.0 -7 17 -0.4 -0.7 12.5 0 0 -1.77 12.5 12.5
J. Pizano-McInnis J. Pizano-McInnis - 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG