🐻⬇️🏀

Charleston

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Charleston Cougars
Program History
Coach: Chris Mack

2012 Team Stats (1 games)

62.0
PPG
69.0
Opp
-7.0
Margin
38.5%
FG%
52.2%
3P%
76.9%
FT%
34.0
RPG
11.0
APG
22.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.1
Adj PPG
65.5
Adj Opp PPG
#147
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2011-2012
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1014 (#159) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1109 (#99) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +101 elo More → 1039 (#112) HCA +101 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More → +1.6 (#148) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More → -1.7 (#195) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.622 (#106) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +3.1 More → 0.587 (#144) AdjNet +3.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +3.1 More → 0.588 (#144) AdjNet +3.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 67.1 | AdjD 65.5 More → 0.537 (#147) AdjO 67.1 | AdjD 65.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 65.2 More → 0.491 (#175) AdjO 64.8 | AdjD 65.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.545 (#144) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.536 (#150) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 158 | GP 27 More → 1041 (#143) RD 158 | GP 27

2012 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2011-11-11 vs Holy Cross Crusaders W 78 - 69
2011-11-15 vs Morehead State Eagles W 72 - 57
2011-11-19 @ Clemson Tigers W 72 - 69
2011-11-24 @ UCF Knights L 63 - 74
2011-11-25 @ UNC Asheville Bulldogs W 68 - 66
2011-11-26 vs UMass Minutemen W 85 - 61
2011-12-01 vs The Citadel Bulldogs W 83 - 64
2011-12-03 vs Chattanooga Mocs W 87 - 85
2011-12-14 vs Tennessee Volunteers W 71 - 65
2011-12-17 vs Charleston Southern Buccaneers W 70 - 68
2011-12-20 @ Louisville Cardinals L 62 - 69
2011-12-22 @ Coastal Carolina Chanticleers W 77 - 70
2011-12-30 vs George Mason Patriots L 76 - 84
2012-01-05 @ Wofford Terriers L 58 - 75
2012-01-07 @ Furman Paladins W 66 - 43
2012-01-14 vs Elon Phoenix W 63 - 44
2012-01-19 @ Davidson Wildcats L 69 - 87
2012-01-26 vs Furman Paladins L 63 - 69
2012-01-28 vs Wofford Terriers L 59 - 68
2012-01-30 @ Samford Bulldogs W 68 - 52
2012-02-04 @ Appalachian State Mountaineers W 74 - 62
2012-02-09 vs Western Carolina Catamounts W 62 - 58
2012-02-15 @ UNC Greensboro Spartans L 63 - 78
2012-02-18 @ Kent State Golden Flashes W 80 - 73
2012-02-23 vs Georgia Southern Eagles W 58 - 53
2012-02-25 @ The Citadel Bulldogs W 55 - 47
2012-03-02 vs Appalachian State Mountaineers L 81 - 93

2012 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Wiggins A. Wiggins F 27 34.9 15.7 6.1 2.1 1.2 0.5 2.4 3.6 19.6 63 23 2.7 3.4 38.8 34.2 73.9 4.51 196.1 45.4
A. Lawrence A. Lawrence G 27 35.1 12.3 2.9 5.6 1.8 0.5 2.7 2.4 17.9 11 23 0.5 0.6 39.4 25.6 73.9 -2.04 218.7 47.0
T. Wiedeman T. Wiedeman F 26 31.5 11.8 8.6 0.8 0.6 1.0 2.5 2.0 18.3 36 22 1.6 2.2 39.6 0.0 58.8 0.36 253.0 39.6
A. Stitt A. Stitt G 18 28.4 10.2 1.8 1.9 1.1 0.2 2.1 1.7 11.3 22 15 1.5 2.4 48.4 46.2 50.0 0.01 280.8 58.1
A. Baru A. Baru F 26 26.8 7.7 6.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.8 13.4 -5 22 -0.2 -0.4 53.2 0 52.5 -0.96 154.8 53.2
M. Sundberg M. Sundberg F 26 20.6 6.1 3.8 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.7 1.5 8.7 16 23 0.7 1.5 34.2 25.0 55.6 0.41 188.3 42.1
N. Johnson N. Johnson G 27 15.9 5.6 1.5 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.8 1.0 6.9 -21 22 -1.0 -2.3 51.9 42.9 85.7 -3.25 251.0 68.5
J. Scott J. Scott G 26 14.2 3.8 1.0 0.6 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.7 4.7 -32 22 -1.5 -4.8 22.2 21.4 50.0 -3.55 259.5 30.6
T. Dixon T. Dixon G 14 4.3 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.9 -29 13 -2.2 -24.1 22.2 33.3 50.0 -5.17 60.7 27.8
J. Carlton J. Carlton G 19 6.4 0.7 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.2 2.5 -16 15 -1.1 -7.8 33.3 0.0 50.0 -1.9 180.4 33.3
P. Branin P. Branin G 7 1.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 -5 6 -0.8 -23.9 100.0 0 0 -0.82 100.0 100.0
B. Benton B. Benton G 5 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 - - - - 0 0 0 -2.43 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG