🐻⬇️🏀

Cal State Bakersfield Roadrunners

Also known as: Cal State Bakersfield Roadrunners
Program History

2013 Team Stats (4 games)

59.8
PPG
69.0
Opp
-1.0
Margin
37.6%
FG%
34.2%
3P%
73.7%
FT%
31.8
RPG
12.0
APG
13.8
TO
74.6
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1103 (#276) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1208 (#219) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 1074 (#75) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +18.4 (#259) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +5.6 (#220) HCA +3.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -9.0 More → 0.250 (#154) NetEff -9.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 69.2 | AdjD 65.7 More → 0.578 (#122) AdjO 69.2 | AdjD 65.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.622 (#206) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.619 (#194) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 156 | GP 30 More → 1057 (#170) RD 156 | GP 30

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
S. Carter S. Carter G 30 31.8 15.9 5.2 2.7 2.3 0.3 3.1 3.0 20.2 -3 -0.1 -0.1 40.7 25.0 81.2 0.06 213.2 41.2
B. Barnes B. Barnes G 30 30.0 12.1 5.3 1.3 1.0 0.2 2.2 2.9 14.8 71 2.7 11.6 39.5 34.6 59.4 0.68 180.9 44.8
T. White T. White G-F 27 28.1 10.7 4.2 2.0 0.7 0.1 2.2 2.4 13.0 44 1.6 2.6 43.1 41.2 93.3 0.28 201.1 53.8
J. Maynor J. Maynor G 30 31.1 10.5 1.8 1.1 1.1 0.1 1.1 2.4 11.2 -23 -0.8 -1.1 42.5 44.1 50.0 0.03 206.5 60.3
A. Young A. Young F 30 26.1 7.5 5.1 1.5 0.8 0.7 1.3 1.2 13.1 137 3.7 5.5 31.4 30.4 83.3 0.71 278.1 41.4
Z. Lamb Z. Lamb G 5 14.6 4.6 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 1.6 2.0 4.4 -48 -9.6 -28.7 50.0 0.0 33.3 -0.79 101.6 50.0
C. Hall C. Hall F 30 16.8 4.1 4.5 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.2 1.0 7.3 160 5.0 7.8 34.5 20.0 50.0 1.29 174.9 36.2
B. Williams B. Williams G 29 21.5 3.7 1.1 3.2 0.7 0.0 1.5 0.9 6.3 62 1.5 2.2 30.8 0.0 77.8 0.98 178.6 30.8
M. Hughley M. Hughley F 6 13.7 3.0 2.8 1.2 0.5 1.0 1.2 0.3 7.0 -5 -0.8 -2.6 50.0 0 100.0 0.14 312.5 50.0
D. Wallace D. Wallace - 3 3.3 3.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 -31 -1.5 -3.3 0 0 0 -0.63 0 0
M. Ratto M. Ratto G 19 7.5 1.6 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.5 2.1 -11 -0.6 -2.2 50.0 44.4 100.0 -0.42 137.9 70.0
K. Jones K. Jones F 12 7.0 1.4 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.2 2.2 285 9.2 14.7 50.0 0 0 1.45 425.0 50.0
E. Kinney E. Kinney F 25 8.1 1.4 1.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.5 2.2 -57 -2.3 -7.6 16.7 0.0 81.8 -0.85 101.0 16.7
J. Omogun J. Omogun F 13 4.0 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.3 -26 -2.0 -16.1 75.0 0 100.0 -0.51 135.1 75.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG