🐻⬇️🏀

Chicago Sky

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Chicago Sky
Program History

2013 Team Stats (36 games)

78.6
PPG
74.1
Opp
+4.6
Margin
41.7%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
81.5%
FT%
36.5
RPG
15.1
APG
11.6
TO
78.1
Est. poss./game
77.2
Adj PPG
73.8
Adj Opp PPG
#3
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1098 (#2) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1092 (#3) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +48 elo More → 1046 (#3) HCA +48 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More → +3.5 (#3) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +1.4 (#3) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.665 (#3) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +4.1 More → 0.616 (#3) AdjNet +4.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +4.1 More → 0.617 (#3) AdjNet +4.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 77.2 | AdjD 73.8 More → 0.577 (#3) AdjO 77.2 | AdjD 73.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 75.7 | AdjD 74.4 More → 0.530 (#3) AdjO 75.7 | AdjD 74.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.593 (#3) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.584 (#3) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 108 | GP 36 More → 1095 (#3) RD 108 | GP 36

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2013-05-27 @ Phoenix Mercury W 102 - 80
2013-05-31 vs Connecticut Sun W 86 - 75
2013-06-02 vs Tulsa Shock W 92 - 71
2013-06-07 @ San Antonio Silver Stars L 69 - 81
2013-06-09 vs San Antonio Silver Stars W 72 - 70
2013-06-16 @ Atlanta Dream L 74 - 88
2013-06-20 @ Tulsa Shock L 74 - 83
2013-06-22 @ Indiana Fever W 71 - 61
2013-06-26 vs New York Liberty W 87 - 74
2013-06-29 vs Los Angeles Sparks W 94 - 82
2013-07-02 vs Seattle Storm L 60 - 69
2013-07-07 @ New York Liberty W 93 - 64
2013-07-10 vs Washington Mystics W 89 - 85
2013-07-12 @ Connecticut Sun W 83 - 70
2013-07-18 @ New York Liberty W 75 - 55
2013-07-20 vs New York Liberty W 80 - 69
2013-07-24 @ Washington Mystics L 78 - 82
2013-08-02 vs Washington Mystics W 85 - 78
2013-08-03 @ Indiana Fever L 58 - 79
2013-08-06 vs Indiana Fever L 58 - 64
2013-08-09 @ Connecticut Sun W 77 - 61
2013-08-11 vs Minnesota Lynx W 94 - 86
2013-08-13 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 76 - 80
2013-08-15 @ Seattle Storm W 79 - 66
2013-08-18 vs Connecticut Sun W 89 - 78
2013-08-20 @ Washington Mystics W 79 - 73
2013-08-23 vs New York Liberty W 82 - 64
2013-08-24 @ Atlanta Dream W 67 - 56
2013-08-31 vs Atlanta Dream W 85 - 68
2013-09-06 vs Indiana Fever L 77 - 82
2013-09-08 @ Washington Mystics W 93 - 79
2013-09-11 vs Phoenix Mercury W 70 - 68
2013-09-13 vs Atlanta Dream W 87 - 82
2013-09-14 @ Minnesota Lynx L 66 - 79
2013-09-20 vs Indiana Fever L 72 - 85
2013-09-22 @ Indiana Fever L 57 - 79

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Elena Delle Donne Elena Delle Donne F 33 31.1 17.9 5.4 1.8 0.7 1.8 1.3 13.2 13.1 - - - - 42.9 43.1 93.0 - 57.1 47.9
Sylvia Fowles Sylvia Fowles Guard 35 31.2 15.9 11.4 0.4 0.9 2.4 2.2 10.6 18.4 - - - - 57.8 0 67.7 - 61.4 57.8
Epiphanny Prince Epiphanny Prince G 34 29.9 14.9 2.6 2.9 1.6 0.4 1.3 12.5 8.5 - - - - 38.1 39.5 90.8 - 52.5 45.6
S. Cash S. Cash F 37 27.9 8.9 5.2 2.1 0.9 0.6 1.8 8.0 7.9 - - - - 40.7 25.0 85.5 - 49.5 43.6
Courtney Vandersloot Courtney Vandersloot - 36 29.6 8.5 3.2 5.5 1.4 0.8 2.5 8.1 8.8 - - - - 38.7 29.8 83.1 - 47.1 41.6
T. Young T. Young F 36 17.6 5.4 3.6 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.6 5.6 4.1 - - - - 41.8 0.0 61.9 - 44.2 41.8
Allie Quigley Allie Quigley G 37 9.6 4.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.6 4.6 0.6 - - - - 32.6 32.8 88.9 - 41.1 38.4
S. Petrovic S. Petrovic F 1 11.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 34.7 0.0
C. Swords C. Swords C 17 11.8 3.7 2.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 2.6 4.8 - - - - 63.6 0 77.8 - 65.7 63.6
S. Murphy S. Murphy F 37 11.0 3.2 1.8 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.4 3.8 1.8 - - - - 31.2 18.0 73.1 - 38.7 35.1
M. Campbell M. Campbell F 33 7.6 1.8 1.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.7 1.7 - - - - 32.1 0 73.3 - 41.9 32.1
A. Warley-Talbert A. Warley-Talbert C 16 7.7 1.1 2.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 1.2 2.4 - - - - 36.8 0 100.0 - 43.4 36.8
P. Stojakovic P. Stojakovic - 20 10.1 1.0 0.8 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.6 1.7 - - - - 22.6 0.0 60.0 - 28.2 22.6
D. Moss D. Moss F 1 10.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2013 Shot Zones

2481 located field-goal attempts in 37 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Fowles37% Donne33% Donne21% Prince31% Donne26% Prince31% Cash33% Prince40% Prince43% Prince38%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Fowles25% Donne23% Donne21% Prince24% Donne20% Prince25% Murphy33% Prince29% Prince26% Prince29%
Misses: who misses most here

Sylvia FowlesElena Delle DonneEpiphanny PrinceS. CashS. Murphy

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 468-845 55.4 936 Sylvia Fowles 37% (344 pts) S. Cash 13% (122 pts) Sylvia Fowles 25% (94 misses) Courtney Vandersloot 17% (63 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 140-387 36.2 280 Elena Delle Donne 33% (92 pts) Sylvia Fowles 22% (62 pts) Elena Delle Donne 23% (58 misses) Sylvia Fowles 18% (45 misses)
Mid-range left 107-315 34.0 214 Elena Delle Donne 21% (46 pts) T. Young 21% (44 pts) Elena Delle Donne 21% (44 misses) Epiphanny Prince 17% (36 misses)
Mid-range center 39-118 33.1 78 Epiphanny Prince 31% (24 pts) Allie Quigley 18% (14 pts) Epiphanny Prince 24% (19 misses) Allie Quigley 19% (15 misses)
Mid-range right 117-315 37.1 234 Elena Delle Donne 26% (62 pts) Epiphanny Prince 18% (42 pts) Elena Delle Donne 20% (40 misses) Epiphanny Prince 20% (39 misses)
Left corner 3 13-37 35.1 39 Epiphanny Prince 31% (12 pts) S. Murphy 23% (9 pts) Epiphanny Prince 25% (6 misses) Allie Quigley 21% (5 misses)
Right corner 3 9-30 30.0 27 S. Cash 33% (9 pts) Allie Quigley 22% (6 pts) S. Murphy 33% (7 misses) Epiphanny Prince 24% (5 misses)
Above-break 3 left 43-147 29.3 129 Epiphanny Prince 40% (51 pts) Elena Delle Donne 28% (36 pts) Epiphanny Prince 29% (30 misses) Elena Delle Donne 21% (22 misses)
Above-break 3 center 21-86 24.4 63 Epiphanny Prince 43% (27 pts) Elena Delle Donne 33% (21 pts) Epiphanny Prince 26% (17 misses) Courtney Vandersloot 20% (13 misses)
Above-break 3 right 78-201 38.8 234 Epiphanny Prince 38% (90 pts) Elena Delle Donne 27% (63 pts) Epiphanny Prince 29% (36 misses) Elena Delle Donne 16% (20 misses)