Arizona State
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1513 (#70) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1522 (#39) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +27.9 (#104) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.356 (#79) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.351 (#79) | AdjNet -5.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.353 (#79) | AdjNet -5.3 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. King
|
G | 13 | 32.6 | 13.7 | 4.9 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 17.6 | - | - | - | 44.0 | 16.7 | 85.7 | 0.84 | 285.6 | 46.0 |
T. Lockett
|
G | 23 | 34.8 | 12.7 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 16.5 | - | - | - | 48.0 | 43.8 | 76.0 | - | 151.0 | 52.7 |
C. Felix
|
G-F | 25 | 33.0 | 11.1 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 13.7 | - | - | - | 42.7 | 31.0 | 80.6 | - | 156.2 | 48.7 |
C. Colvin
|
G | 23 | 26.9 | 7.6 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 10.2 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 36.4 | 67.7 | - | 157.3 | 40.5 |
K. Cain
|
F | 25 | 23.5 | 7.4 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 43.3 | 0.0 | 91.7 | - | 141.7 | 43.3 |
J. Gilling
|
F | 26 | 23.4 | 7.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 51.9 | 52.4 | 75.0 | - | 166.9 | 72.2 |
J. Bachynski
|
C | 26 | 17.4 | 5.7 | 4.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 57.8 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 120.8 | 57.8 |
C. Creekmur
|
G-F | 26 | 23.3 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 55.0 | 53.1 | 50.0 | - | 153.3 | 76.2 |
R. Pateev
|
C | 25 | 16.0 | 4.6 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 6.8 | - | - | - | 79.2 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 215.8 | 79.2 |
P. Newton
|
G | 4 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
D. Whitmore
|
- | 6 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Heller
|
G | 13 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 25.0 | 25.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG