2002 WNBA Model Performance
Season
Every ranked model predicted the same 211 games (2002-06-16 to 2002-08-31, 11 weekly windows) out of sample: each week's games were predicted by models fit only on the season's earlier games.
Model Performance Leaderboard
Ranked by full-season AUC. The final week is the season's last 7 played days (3 games, 2002-08-25 to 2002-08-31), predicted from every earlier game: a small sample that shows the latest form.
| # | Model | AUC | Acc | Brier | LogLoss | AUC final wk | Acc final wk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. More → | 0.691 | 65.9% | 0.227 | 0.651 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 0.687 | 62.6% | 0.225 | 0.642 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 0.686 | 63.5% | 0.226 | 0.643 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 4 | Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.686 | 62.6% | 0.225 | 0.642 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 5 | Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | 0.675 | 64.0% | 0.229 | 0.650 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 6 | Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.673 | 63.5% | 0.229 | 0.650 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 7 | Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.658 | 64.5% | 0.231 | 0.652 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 8 | Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.656 | 64.9% | 0.231 | 0.654 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 9 | Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 0.655 | 62.1% | 0.238 | 0.669 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 10 | Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 0.641 | 60.7% | 0.235 | 0.662 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 11 | Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 0.625 | 58.8% | 0.243 | 0.679 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 12 | Avg Margin Baseline Avg Margin Baseline Predict from simple average scoring margin in the training window. More → | 0.611 | 58.8% | 0.240 | 0.673 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 13 | Home Team Baseline Home Team Baseline Always favor the home team with a fixed prior. More → | 0.611 | 61.1% | 0.238 | 0.668 | 0.750 | 66.7% |
| 14 | Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.610 | 58.3% | 0.249 | 0.695 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 15 | Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.610 | 58.8% | 0.249 | 0.695 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
| 16 | Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.605 | 58.8% | 0.242 | 0.677 | 1.000 | 100.0% |
Methodology
Out-of-sample windows
- The season is split into 7-day windows ending on its last played day
- Each window is predicted by models refit on all earlier games of the season
- The first window starts after 21 days of games
- Every model is scored on the same games; a model that cannot predict most of them is listed as not compared
Elo / Bradley-Terry
- Elo: the published league Elo (preseason priors and carryover where configured), frozen at the window start
- Bradley-Terry: static logistic fit on the earlier games
- Recency variants weight games with a 120-day half-life in NCAA leagues (keeping the non-conference games that link conferences) and a 30-day half-life in pro leagues
Pythagorean and margin models
- Raw, adjusted and log-adjusted Pythagorean from scores; efficiency from box-score possessions
- Margin: ridge regression on point margin with a learned home advantage
- Ensembles average the log-odds of five families
Baselines
- Home Team: the home team wins 60% (50% at neutral sites)
- Avg Margin: the higher average margin so far wins
- Models should beat these to add value