🐻⬇️🏀

Team model

Adjusted Context Blend

Experimental context-heavy win model blending strong team components with rest and venue context.

Status implemented Short Name Adj+
Rating Style probability Where Shown model performance

Model Card

Context-heavy second-stage win model that blends our strongest component ratings with rest and venue context. This remains an exploratory team baseline: useful in the bakeoff and model pages, but not yet clean enough for the main public team-output surfaces.

Validation on this page uses stored season-level full-fit rows plus strict weekly rolling holdouts. Rolling ranks are based on average weekly log loss in the selected league/season. Current scope: All Games. All scored games in the selected league and season. AP Poll is excluded here.

Selected League / Season

Use the selected scope to inspect this model against peers and across rolling weekly holdouts.

Full Fit AUC - · 0 games
7-Day Holdout Log Loss 0.543 (#3) · 13 games
Rolling Avg Log Loss 0.594 (#9) · 22 windows
Window Wins 0 · 71.0% rolling accuracy

Full-fit AUC is only available where the older stored-rating batch produced that model for the selected scope. Recency and ensemble families can still have valid 7-day and rolling holdout results even when the full-fit columns are blank.

Rolling Holdout Curves

Selected model plus comparison peers for NCAAM 2025-2026. The focus line is Adjusted Context Blend. Click legend items to hide/show peers.

Log Loss Brier AUC Accuracy

Weekly strict holdout log loss. Lower is better. Showing 6 models across 22 windows.

Recent Windows

Holdout Log Loss Rank Winner
Apr 1 - Apr 6 0.543 #3/16 Log Adjusted (0.537)
Mar 25 - Mar 31 0.633 #7/16 Log Adjusted (0.600)
Mar 18 - Mar 24 0.508 #7/16 Adjusted Efficiency (0.447)
Mar 11 - Mar 17 0.635 #11/16 Margin Recency (0.599)
Mar 4 - Mar 10 0.615 #14/16 Core Ensemble (0.587)
Feb 25 - Mar 3 0.596 #7/16 Points Off/Def Recency (0.578)
Feb 18 - Feb 24 0.606 #7/16 Margin (0.590)
Feb 11 - Feb 17 0.634 #11/16 Recency Ensemble (0.614)

Selected Scope Peer Table

Comparison snapshot for NCAAM 2025-2026. Rows are ordered by rolling log-loss rank; full-fit AUC may be blank for models that do not have legacy full-season rows stored for this scope.

Model Full AUC AUC Rank 7d LogLoss 7d Rank Rolling LL Rolling Rank Windows
Margin 0.822 #2 0.577 #4 0.548 #1 22
Core Ensemble - - 0.620 #6 0.551 #2 22
Recency Ensemble - - 0.637 #7 0.553 #3 22
Margin Recency - - 0.641 #8 0.554 #4 22
Points Off/Def 0.812 #5 0.579 #5 0.561 #5 22
Adjusted Context Blend - - 0.543 #3 0.594 #9 22

League × Season Summary

Cross-scope validation history for Adjusted Context Blend. Rolling ranks are by average weekly log loss.

League Season Full AUC AUC Rank 7d LL 7d Rank Rolling LL Rolling Rank Windows Wins
WNBA 2025 - - 0.590 #7 0.635 #8 21 1
NCAAWD2 2025-2026 - - 0.485 #3 0.626 #10 14 0
NCAAW 2025-2026 - - 0.631 #12 0.543 #6 22 1
NCAAMD2 2025-2026 - - 0.534 #3 0.599 #11 14 0
NCAAM 2025-2026 - - 0.543 #3 0.594 #9 22 0
NBA 2025-2026 - - 0.557 #1 0.629 #14 26 2
GLEAGUE 2025-2026 - - 0.793 #10 0.707 #16 22 0