🐻⬇️🏀

2025-2026 NBA Model Performance Analysis

Scope

All scored games in the selected league and season. AP Poll is excluded here.

Comparing prediction accuracy across 1305 games using multiple rating models.

Model Catalog

7-day holdout coverage: 16/17 models .

Rolling Holdout Curves

Each point is a strict weekly holdout: train on all games before that week, test on that week. This first version uses a 21-day warmup, then 7-day holdouts stepped forward weekly.

Log Loss Brier AUC Accuracy

Weekly strict holdout log loss. Lower is better. Showing 16 models across 33 windows. Click legend items to hide/show series.

Recent Window Winners

Holdout Best Log Loss Runner-up Models
Jun 3 Elo 0.636 Bradley-Terry Recency (0.687) 16
May 27 - Jun 2 Home Team Baseline 0.714 Points Off/Def Recency (0.718) 16
May 20 - May 26 Adjusted Context Blend 0.551 Log Adjusted (0.551) 16
May 13 - May 19 Elo 0.615 Bradley-Terry Recency (0.655) 16
May 6 - May 12 Log Adjusted 0.495 Adjusted Efficiency (0.496) 16
Apr 29 - May 5 Points Off/Def 0.654 Margin (0.654) 16
Apr 22 - Apr 28 Adjusted Context Blend 0.589 Bradley-Terry (0.590) 16
Apr 15 - Apr 21 Home Team Baseline 0.646 Bradley-Terry Recency (0.709) 16

Model Performance Leaderboard

Models ranked by strict holdout AUC when available (fallback: full-season AUC). Hover over column headers for explanations.

# Model 7d Split AUC Acc Brier LogLoss n AUC 7d Acc 7d Brier 7d n 7d
1 Avg Margin Baseline Avg Margin Baseline Predict from simple average scoring margin in the training window. More → STRICT
3g
0.757 69.1% 0.203 0.593 1173 - 0.0% 0.287 3
2 Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → FULL
no 7d
0.750 67.8% 0.204 0.593 1173 - - - 0
3 Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → STRICT
3g
0.749 67.3% 0.209 0.607 1173 - 0.0% 0.304 3
4 Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → STRICT
3g
0.748 68.2% 0.215 0.622 1173 - 0.0% 0.262 3
5 Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → STRICT
3g
0.747 67.8% 0.205 0.596 1173 - 0.0% 0.308 3
6 Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → STRICT
3g
0.747 67.8% 0.205 0.596 1173 - 0.0% 0.308 3
7 Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → STRICT
3g
0.746 67.9% 0.206 0.601 1173 - 0.0% 0.332 3
8 Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → STRICT
3g
0.740 67.4% 0.212 0.613 1173 - 0.0% 0.305 3
9 Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → STRICT
3g
0.738 68.1% 0.208 0.604 1173 - 33.3% 0.293 3
10 Home Team Baseline Home Team Baseline Always favor the home team with a fixed prior. More → STRICT
3g
0.550 55.0% 0.250 0.693 1173 - 33.3% 0.293 3
- Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → STRICT
3g
- - - - 0 - 33.3% 0.299 3
- Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → STRICT
3g
- - - - 0 - 66.7% 0.251 3
- Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → STRICT
3g
- - - - 0 - 66.7% 0.250 3
- Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → STRICT
3g
- - - - 0 - 33.3% 0.288 3
- Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → STRICT
3g
- - - - 0 - 33.3% 0.278 3
- Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → STRICT
3g
- - - - 0 - 0.0% 0.291 3
- Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Experimental context-heavy win model blending strong team components with rest and venue context. More → STRICT
3g
- - - - 0 - 0.0% 0.352 3

Methodology

ELO / Bradley-Terry

  • ELO: Iterative updates, K=64, HCA=100
  • BT: Static logistic regression on all games
  • Both model win probability, not margin
  • ELO updates after each game; BT fits once

Pythagorean Models

  • Raw: Classic points scored/allowed formula
  • Efficiency: Pace-adjusted (pts per possession)
  • Adjusted: Opponent-adjusted efficiency
  • Log: Log-linear multiplicative scale

Margin Regression

  • Team-level ridge regression on point margin
  • Linear Bradley-Terry (margin target)
  • Alpha=0.05 (CV-tuned)
  • Learns home advantage from data (~6 pts)

Baselines

  • Home Team: Always predict home wins (60%)
  • Avg Margin: Higher average margin wins
  • Models should beat these to add value