🐻⬇️🏀

Washington State

Also known as: Washington State Cougars, Washington State
Program History

2013 Team Stats (7 games)

66.7
PPG
63.0
Opp
+1.4
Margin
43.4%
FG%
34.4%
3P%
71.3%
FT%
33.9
RPG
13.0
APG
13.7
TO
73.9
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1507 (#69) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1395 (#91) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 952 (#491) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +30.0 (#88) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +16.3 (#71) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.422 (#70) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -0.4 More → 0.488 (#99) NetEff -0.4
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -0.5 More → 0.486 (#64) AdjNet -0.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -0.5 More → 0.484 (#65) AdjNet -0.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.3 | AdjD 61.0 More → 0.598 (#102) AdjO 65.3 | AdjD 61.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.753 (#118) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.726 (#115) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 138 | GP 32 More → 1021 (#195) RD 138 | GP 32

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-10 vs Eastern Washington Eagles W 88 - 69
2012-11-14 vs Utah Valley Wolverines W 72 - 49
2012-11-16 @ Pepperdine Waves L 56 - 58
2012-11-19 @ Kansas Jayhawks L 41 - 78
2012-11-20 @ Texas A&M Aggies L 54 - 55
2012-11-24 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions W 66 - 38
2012-11-28 vs Idaho Vandals W 64 - 55
2012-12-01 vs Portland Pilots W 72 - 60
2012-12-05 vs Gonzaga Bulldogs L 69 - 71
2012-12-09 vs Fresno State Bulldogs W 59 - 50
2012-12-13 vs Jackson State Tigers W 52 - 41
2012-12-21 vs Buffalo Bulls W 65 - 54
2012-12-29 vs Idaho State Bengals W 74 - 39
2013-01-05 vs Washington Huskies L 63 - 68
2013-01-09 @ Stanford Cardinal L 67 - 78
2013-01-12 @ California Golden Bears L 54 - 67
2013-01-16 vs Utah Utes W 75 - 65
2013-01-19 vs Colorado Buffaloes L 49 - 58
2013-01-23 @ Oregon Ducks L 61 - 68
2013-01-26 @ Oregon State Beavers W 71 - 68
2013-01-31 vs Arizona State Sun Devils L 59 - 63
2013-02-02 vs Arizona Wildcats L 65 - 79
2013-02-07 @ USC Trojans L 68 - 72
2013-02-09 @ UCLA Bruins L 62 - 76
2013-02-13 vs Oregon State Beavers L 66 - 67
2013-02-16 vs Oregon Ducks L 77 - 79
2013-02-20 @ Arizona State Sun Devils L 57 - 69
2013-02-23 @ Arizona Wildcats L 56 - 73
2013-03-03 @ Washington Huskies L 68 - 72
2013-03-06 vs UCLA Bruins W 73 - 61
2013-03-09 vs USC Trojans W 76 - 51
2013-03-13 @ Washington Huskies L 62 - 64

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
B. Motum B. Motum F 32 35.3 18.7 6.3 1.1 0.6 0.8 2.4 4.6 20.5 78 2.6 3.5 41.5 31.2 67.8 1.41 172.6 46.6
R. Woolridge R. Woolridge G 32 32.0 11.0 2.8 2.7 1.0 0.1 2.1 3.2 12.3 70 2.3 3.1 47.5 47.5 79.3 1.03 154.3 56.9
M. Ladd M. Ladd G 26 31.3 10.5 5.9 2.4 0.8 0.1 1.7 2.7 15.3 66 2.6 3.9 40.8 21.7 44.4 0.68 165.3 44.4
D. Lacy D. Lacy G 25 29.5 10.5 2.9 2.0 0.9 0.0 1.8 2.7 11.8 -33 -1.4 -2.1 38.2 37.5 71.4 -0.13 157.7 49.3
D. Kernich-Drew D. Kernich-Drew G 32 23.3 6.4 2.4 1.3 0.2 0.2 1.1 2.0 7.3 26 0.9 1.5 42.2 33.3 62.5 0.51 151.1 52.3
D.J. Shelton D.J. Shelton F 32 26.4 6.2 6.0 1.8 0.6 0.5 1.7 1.9 11.5 77 2.6 4.4 33.3 26.7 72.0 0.71 139.4 40.0
W. DiIorio W. DiIorio G 30 16.3 3.2 2.1 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.8 5.2 35 1.2 2.8 40.0 25.0 52.4 0.76 138.7 42.0
B. Boese B. Boese F 15 7.4 1.3 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 2.0 -23 -1.5 -7.3 42.9 25.0 0 -0.32 142.9 50.0
J. Hunter J. Hunter C 9 3.2 1.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.2 1 0.1 1.2 100.0 0 100.0 -0.03 266.0 100.0
J. Longrus J. Longrus F 32 10.2 1.0 2.0 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.5 3.0 -4 -0.1 -0.4 41.2 0 16.7 0.2 78.9 41.2
B. Leavitt B. Leavitt G 20 5.7 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 1.3 -3 -0.2 -0.9 25.0 0 90.0 0.19 77.4 25.0
K. Hayenga K. Hayenga F 9 2.6 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 - - - 33.3 0.0 0 - 50.0 33.3
D. Ballard D. Ballard G 12 5.1 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.3 3 0.2 1.7 0 0 0 0.01 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG