UConn
2018 Team Stats (9 games)
64.3
PPG
74.0
Opp
-9.9
Margin
39.9%
FG%
28.5%
3P%
75.4%
FT%
32.9
RPG
8.1
APG
12.1
TO
76.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2017-2018
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1841 (#1) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1604 (#4) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +41.5 (#9) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.184 (#81) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.123 (#74) | NetEff -17.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.490 (#67) | AdjNet -0.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.493 (#67) | AdjNet -0.3 |
2018 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-23 | @ | Oregon Ducks | W | 71 - 63 |
| 2017-12-21 | @ | Arizona Wildcats | L | 58 - 73 |
| 2017-12-30 | vs | Wichita State Shockers | L | 62 - 72 |
| 2018-01-10 | vs | UCF Knights | W | 62 - 53 |
| 2018-01-20 | vs | Villanova Wildcats | L | 61 - 81 |
| 2018-02-03 | vs | Cincinnati Bearcats | L | 57 - 65 |
| 2018-02-10 | @ | Wichita State Shockers | L | 74 - 95 |
| 2018-02-22 | @ | Cincinnati Bearcats | L | 52 - 77 |
| 2018-03-04 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 71 - 81 |
| 2018-03-08 | vs | SMU Mustangs | L | 73 - 80 |
2018 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Adams
|
G | 9 | 38.6 | 16.6 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 14.9 | 8.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 38.8 | 25.0 | 76.7 | 0.23 | 50.6 | 42.2 |
A. Gilbert
|
G | 1 | 32.0 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 66.7 | 40.0 | - | 56.3 | 58.3 |
C. Vital
|
G | 10 | 33.0 | 15.6 | 6.3 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.1 | 13.3 | - | - | - | 39.6 | 37.5 | 83.3 | - | 63.9 | 48.5 |
T. Larrier
|
G | 10 | 34.1 | 13.1 | 4.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 12.5 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 33.6 | 20.0 | 81.2 | - | 47.1 | 36.8 |
A. Anderson
|
G | 10 | 28.1 | 7.0 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 80 | 6.2 | 8.9 | 39.6 | 24.0 | 76.2 | 2.05 | 56.2 | 45.3 |
J. Carlton
|
C | 10 | 16.5 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 51.5 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 60.2 | 51.5 |
M. Diarra
|
F | 9 | 11.1 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 83.3 | 0 | 54.5 | - | 89.1 | 83.3 |
E. Cobb
|
F | 4 | 8.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 69.8 | 71.4 |
D. Onuorah
|
F | 10 | 11.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 61.5 | 50.0 |
T. Polley
|
- | 10 | 9.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 23.1 | 28.6 | 50.0 | - | 33.9 | 30.8 |
K. Williams
|
F | 4 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 22 | 2.2 | 6.5 | 66.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.68 | 58.1 | 66.7 |
I. Whaley
|
F | 10 | 11.9 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 53.8 | 28.6 |
M. Noyes
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG