๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

UCLA

Also known as: UCLA Bruins, UCLA
Program History

2014 Team Stats (18 games)

78.8
PPG
68.5
Opp
+10.3
Margin
48.3%
FG%
34.1%
3P%
73.0%
FT%
35.1
RPG
16.9
APG
10.1
TO
-
Est. poss./game
81.8
Adj PPG
65.8
Adj Opp PPG
#14
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2013-2014
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1305 (#12) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1291 (#19) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +92 elo More โ†’ 1159 (#15) HCA +92 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More โ†’ +17.0 (#14) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ +16.8 (#10) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.837 (#21) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +23.9 More โ†’ 0.941 (#20) AdjNet +23.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +24.1 More โ†’ 0.942 (#20) AdjNet +24.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 81.8 | AdjD 65.8 More โ†’ 0.811 (#14) AdjO 81.8 | AdjD 65.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 78.6 | AdjD 66.4 More โ†’ 0.752 (#9) AdjO 78.6 | AdjD 66.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.865 (#11) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.857 (#12) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 93 | GP 37 More โ†’ 1317 (#15) RD 93 | GP 37

2014 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2013-11-08 vs Drexel Dragons W 72 - 67
2013-11-12 vs Oakland Golden Grizzlies W 91 - 60
2013-11-18 vs Sacramento State Hornets W 86 - 50
2013-11-22 vs Morehead State Eagles W 81 - 70
2013-11-24 vs Chattanooga Mocs W 106 - 65
2013-11-28 vs Nevada Wolf Pack W 105 - 84
2013-11-29 vs Northwestern Wildcats W 95 - 79
2013-12-03 vs UC Santa Barbara Gauchos W 89 - 76
2013-12-07 @ Missouri Tigers L 71 - 80
2013-12-14 vs Prairie View A&M Panthers W 95 - 71
2013-12-19 @ Duke Blue Devils L 63 - 80
2013-12-22 vs Weber State Wildcats W 83 - 60
2013-12-28 vs Alabama Crimson Tide W 75 - 67
2014-01-05 vs USC Trojans W 107 - 73
2014-01-09 vs Arizona Wildcats L 75 - 79
2014-01-12 vs Arizona State Sun Devils W 87 - 72
2014-01-16 @ Colorado Buffaloes W 69 - 56
2014-01-18 @ Utah Utes L 69 - 74
2014-01-23 vs Stanford Cardinal W 91 - 74
2014-01-26 vs California Golden Bears W 76 - 64
2014-01-30 @ Oregon Ducks W 70 - 68
2014-02-02 @ Oregon State Beavers L 67 - 71
2014-02-08 @ USC Trojans W 83 - 73
2014-02-13 vs Colorado Buffaloes W 92 - 74
2014-02-15 vs Utah Utes W 80 - 66
2014-02-19 @ California Golden Bears W 86 - 66
2014-02-22 @ Stanford Cardinal L 74 - 83
2014-02-27 vs Oregon Ducks L 83 - 87
2014-03-02 vs Oregon State Beavers W 74 - 69
2014-03-06 @ Washington Huskies W 91 - 82
2014-03-08 @ Washington State Cougars L 55 - 73
2014-03-13 vs Oregon Ducks W 82 - 63
2014-03-14 vs Stanford Cardinal W 84 - 59
2014-03-15 @ Arizona Wildcats W 75 - 71
2014-03-21 vs Tulsa Golden Hurricane W 76 - 59
2014-03-23 vs Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks W 77 - 60
2014-03-27 @ Florida Gators L 68 - 79

2014 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Jordan Adams Jordan Adams G 32 30.1 17.5 5.4 2.4 2.6 0.2 1.5 7.9 18.7 329 33 10.0 14.5 47.0 30.0 79.5 3.41 92.8 52.4
Kyle Anderson Kyle Anderson G 32 33.5 14.8 8.8 6.5 1.8 0.8 3.1 6.3 23.3 359 33 10.9 14.3 48.0 52.8 73.4 7.29 97.6 52.7
Norman Powell Norman Powell G 33 25.8 11.2 2.8 1.6 1.5 0.4 1.0 4.7 11.8 170 34 5.0 8.2 53.2 24.3 78.6 -1.56 99.3 56.1
Zach LaVine Zach LaVine G 33 24.4 9.2 2.6 1.8 0.9 0.2 1.1 5.1 8.4 104 33 3.2 5.5 43.2 34.5 64.1 -1.16 81.1 52.1
Bryce Alford Bryce Alford G 33 22.8 7.8 1.7 2.7 0.8 0.1 1.3 3.7 8.2 103 33 3.1 5.7 36.1 36.6 81.5 -0.37 88.8 46.7
Travis Wear Travis Wear F 30 24.2 7.1 3.1 1.5 0.8 0.6 0.4 3.6 9.1 196 31 6.3 11.1 52.3 31.2 75.0 1.7 92.9 54.7
Tony Parker Tony Parker F 33 17.4 6.9 4.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 2.9 8.7 93 34 2.7 7.1 57.3 0 42.5 -0.6 100.4 57.3
David Wear David Wear F 33 22.9 6.8 3.9 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.9 3.4 8.1 206 34 6.1 11.5 50.5 45.2 73.9 2.91 93.3 56.8
Wanaah Bail Wanaah Bail F 12 4.3 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 1.7 -8 10 -0.8 -7.6 50.0 0 57.1 -1.78 63.2 50.0
Noah Allen Noah Allen G 11 3.5 1.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.0 -13 9 -1.4 -23.9 57.1 0.0 42.9 -2.31 54.6 57.1
Kory Alford Kory Alford G 10 1.5 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 1 6 0.2 3.3 0.0 0 100.0 -0.77 133.0 0.0
David Brown David Brown G 10 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 -1 6 -0.2 -3.2 0 0 100.0 -1.3 113.6 0
Aubrey Williams Aubrey Williams G 9 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 -1 6 -0.2 -4.4 0 0 50.0 -1.17 56.8 0
Nick Kazemi Nick Kazemi G 9 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 2 6 0.3 9.7 0.0 0 0 -0.55 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG