🐻⬇️🏀

UC Santa Barbara Gauchos

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: UC Santa Barbara Gauchos
Program History

2025 Team Stats (2 games)

62.0
PPG
41.0
Opp
+21.0
Margin
39.5%
FG%
23.1%
3P%
64.7%
FT%
40.0
RPG
11.5
APG
14.5
TO
79.0
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 1025 (#156) HCA +113 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +9.3 (#210) HCA +2.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 60.7 | AdjD 59.2 More → 0.535 (#185) AdjO 60.7 | AdjD 59.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.748 (#169) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.706 (#176) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 139 | GP 25 More → 1038 (#189) RD 139 | GP 25

2025 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2024-11-06 vs Claremont Mudd Scripps Athenas W 70 - 26
2025-03-12 vs Cal Poly Mustangs L 54 - 56

2025 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Marin A. Marin G 2 27.5 12.5 1.5 3.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 13.0 4.0 46 1.5 1.8 30.8 20.0 70.0 0.85 41.1 34.6
S. Burke S. Burke G 2 27.5 12.0 7.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 3.0 7.5 13.5 71 2.4 3.2 66.7 33.3 50.0 1.2 68.0 70.0
A. Choice A. Choice G 2 20.5 8.0 3.5 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 6.5 6.5 13 0.4 0.7 46.2 40.0 50.0 0.2 54.2 53.8
J. Grant J. Grant G 2 23.0 6.0 3.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 7.0 4.5 51 1.6 2.8 28.6 28.6 0 1.0 42.9 42.9
M. Pietsch M. Pietsch G 2 13.0 5.5 1.0 2.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 4.5 4.0 9 0.4 1.1 33.3 20.0 100.0 0.03 51.1 38.9
Z. Borter Z. Borter F 2 26.5 5.5 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 6.0 2.0 37 1.2 1.4 25.0 33.3 50.0 0.39 37.6 33.3
O. Bradley O. Bradley F 1 25.0 5.0 7.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 8.0 11 0.5 1.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.05 51.2 50.0
F. Goed F. Goed C 1 14.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 18 0.8 3.8 100.0 0 0 -0.21 100.0 100.0
A. Ranjitkar A. Ranjitkar G 1 7.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0 0 -2.15 100.0 100.0
L. Rockwood L. Rockwood C 2 18.0 3.0 7.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 -8 -0.3 -0.6 50.0 0 0 -0.12 50.0 50.0
C. Williams C. Williams F 1 21.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 7.0 1.0 32 1.1 2.3 14.3 0.0 0 0.65 14.3 14.3
A. Cabuena A. Cabuena F 1 7.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
K. Coon K. Coon G 1 13.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 18 0.9 4.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 -0.22 53.2 0.0
M. Mastora M. Mastora G 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -2.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.84 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG