UC Irvine
2012 Team Stats (2 games)
61.5
PPG
71.9
Opp
-3.9
Margin
37.7%
FG%
36.4%
3P%
62.5%
FT%
33.5
RPG
13.0
APG
14.5
TO
80.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1457 (#92) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1278 (#158) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +25.2 (#133) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.403 (#76) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.065 (#194) | NetEff -21.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.125 (#102) | AdjNet -16.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.122 (#102) | AdjNet -17.1 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. McNealy
|
G | 27 | 29.3 | 10.9 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 14.9 | - | - | - | 44.2 | 48.1 | 75.0 | - | 175.5 | 52.6 |
M. Wilder
|
G-F | 27 | 30.1 | 10.8 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 14.9 | - | - | - | 45.1 | 38.0 | 89.5 | - | 184.0 | 58.5 |
D. Starring
|
G | 27 | 31.6 | 10.4 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 38.4 | 30.0 | 70.0 | - | 172.4 | 44.5 |
W. Davis II
|
F | 26 | 21.7 | 8.2 | 5.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 41.0 | 0 | 58.3 | - | 160.7 | 41.0 |
A. Folker
|
C | 27 | 22.2 | 8.0 | 6.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 12.6 | - | - | - | 52.0 | 0 | 36.4 | - | 181.8 | 52.0 |
D. Flowers
|
G | 27 | 26.3 | 7.7 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 9.2 | - | - | - | 40.5 | 35.3 | 68.2 | - | 200.3 | 47.6 |
A. Wright
|
G | 8 | 20.8 | 7.1 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 8.6 | 39 | 3.5 | 5.5 | 30.0 | 40.0 | 57.1 | 1.36 | 108.9 | 35.0 |
M. Best
|
F | 27 | 11.4 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 6.1 | - | - | - | 48.1 | 42.9 | 0.0 | - | 224.1 | 53.7 |
C. Woods
|
G | 26 | 14.2 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 28.0 | 33.3 | 72.7 | - | 140.8 | 38.0 |
T. Souza
|
G | 21 | 9.1 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 66.7 | - | 172.7 | 75.0 |
M. Bradley
|
F | 20 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 109.0 | 66.7 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG