Stanford Cardinal
2012 Team Stats (27 games)
75.7
PPG
56.3
Opp
+19.4
Margin
45.0%
FG%
31.8%
3P%
74.9%
FT%
39.2
RPG
16.4
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
79.3
Adj PPG
47.1
Adj Opp PPG
#4
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1641 (#3) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1536 (#2) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1293 (#2) | HCA +78 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +34.4 (#4) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +34.1 (#4) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.975 (#4) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.998 (#4) | AdjNet +52.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.998 (#4) | AdjNet +53.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.949 (#4) | AdjO 79.3 | AdjD 47.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.906 (#4) | AdjO 74.5 | AdjD 49.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.976 (#4) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.972 (#4) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1499 (#3) | RD 93 | GP 37 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Ogwumike
|
NA | 26 | 0.0 | 22.9 | 10.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 16.0 | 19.3 | 572 | 31 | 18.5 | 26.0 | 53.5 | 8.3 | 82.7 | 8.11 | 60.0 | 53.6 |
C. Ogwumike
|
F | 27 | 0.0 | 14.9 | 10.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 10.0 | 16.8 | 577 | 31 | 18.6 | 28.4 | 57.0 | 0 | 63.7 | 8.5 | 60.0 | 57.0 |
J. Tinkle
|
NA | 17 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 5.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 6.6 | 11.2 | 322 | 31 | 10.4 | 18.9 | 48.7 | 40.5 | 92.7 | -0.56 | 63.0 | 56.2 |
T. Kokenis
|
G | 25 | 0.0 | 9.2 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 9.5 | 5.7 | 550 | 31 | 17.7 | 24.9 | 35.7 | 28.4 | 78.3 | 6.07 | 44.7 | 41.0 |
A. Orrange
|
G | 16 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 280 | 31 | 9.0 | 21.0 | 43.8 | 33.3 | 70.0 | 2.2 | 48.1 | 44.9 |
T. Greenfield
|
F | 11 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 238 | 27 | 8.8 | 21.8 | 44.7 | 41.9 | 100.0 | 0.28 | 59.5 | 58.5 |
L. La Rocque
|
NA | 10 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 6.2 | 2.1 | 331 | 30 | 11.0 | 21.7 | 22.6 | 25.5 | 50.0 | -0.54 | 35.1 | 33.9 |
J. Okrzesik
|
G | 4 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 68 | 7 | 9.7 | 25.9 | 36.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.49 | 35.0 | 36.4 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG