Stanford Cardinal
2014 Team Stats (10 games)
66.0
PPG
66.7
Opp
-0.7
Margin
43.6%
FG%
34.0%
3P%
71.5%
FT%
33.5
RPG
9.4
APG
10.3
TO
-
Est. poss./game
74.5
Adj PPG
63.0
Adj Opp PPG
#34
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2013-2014
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1165 (#56) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1226 (#42) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1096 (#53) | HCA +92 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +12.6 (#34) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +11.3 (#36) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.673 (#75) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.893 (#33) | AdjNet +18.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.895 (#33) | AdjNet +18.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.741 (#34) | AdjO 74.5 | AdjD 63.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.648 (#48) | AdjO 69.6 | AdjD 62.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.788 (#35) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.773 (#36) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1233 (#42) | RD 93 | GP 36 |
2014 Schedule & Results
2014 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chasson Randle
|
G | 30 | 35.6 | 18.8 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 7.1 | 16.3 | 121 | 33 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 42.0 | 32.1 | 76.0 | 2.62 | 110.9 | 48.1 |
D. Powell
|
F | 30 | 32.2 | 14.5 | 7.0 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 5.7 | 18.2 | 86 | 33 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 45.9 | 23.5 | 63.7 | -0.4 | 101.2 | 47.1 |
A. Brown
|
G | 30 | 33.3 | 11.4 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 13.0 | 118 | 32 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 46.5 | 44.0 | 77.1 | 2.52 | 115.1 | 55.1 |
J. Huestis
|
F | 30 | 35.0 | 10.9 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 16.2 | 124 | 33 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 44.6 | 30.8 | 57.1 | 2.17 | 98.2 | 47.3 |
S. Nastic
|
C | 30 | 20.0 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 8.9 | 84 | 33 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 54.4 | 0 | 68.9 | 1.08 | 113.4 | 54.4 |
A. Bright
|
G | 5 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 8.2 | - | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 375.0 | 37.5 |
J. Gage
|
F | 28 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 4.0 | 36 | 31 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 32.7 | 26.8 | 100.0 | 2.22 | 92.3 | 43.9 |
R. Lemons
|
G | 29 | 12.9 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 12 | 32 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 37.5 | 20.0 | 83.3 | -0.94 | 118.2 | 43.8 |
M. Allen
|
G | 27 | 9.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 2.5 | -5 | 30 | -0.2 | -0.8 | 25.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | -0.84 | 77.3 | 26.8 |
J. Ryan
|
- | 4 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Allen
|
C | 14 | 4.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | -1 | 15 | -0.1 | -0.7 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.6 | 381.9 | 100.0 |
G. Verhoeven
|
C | 27 | 5.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | -31 | 30 | -1.0 | -7.8 | 40.0 | 0 | 83.3 | -4.04 | 98.2 | 40.0 |
W. Morgan
|
G | 7 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.9 | -3 | 6 | -0.5 | -10.2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | -1.72 | 56.8 | 0 |
R. Allen
|
F | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
S. Rimmer
|
C | 4 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 19 | 14 | 1.4 | 12.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.18 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG