Stanford Cardinal
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1276 (#40) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1182 (#58) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1127 (#30) | HCA +101 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +12.1 (#32) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +14.4 (#17) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.822 (#27) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.911 (#29) | AdjNet +20.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.913 (#29) | AdjNet +20.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.737 (#32) | AdjO 71.7 | AdjD 60.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.720 (#16) | AdjO 72.1 | AdjD 61.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.809 (#27) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.807 (#23) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1207 (#44) | RD 89 | GP 34 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chasson Randle
|
G | 34 | 30.5 | 14.1 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 15.8 | 179 | 31 | 5.8 | 8.2 | 41.8 | 39.3 | 65.5 | 2.65 | 230.8 | 53.8 |
J. Owens
|
F-C | 34 | 27.0 | 11.7 | 5.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 16.3 | 166 | 31 | 5.4 | 8.5 | 59.0 | 0 | 68.4 | 3.47 | 217.8 | 59.0 |
A. Bright
|
G | 34 | 28.2 | 11.7 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 13.3 | 140 | 31 | 4.5 | 7.2 | 39.4 | 39.4 | 92.6 | 1.87 | 239.5 | 48.6 |
A. Brown
|
G | 34 | 24.3 | 8.2 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 11.1 | 48 | 31 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 38.3 | 40.0 | 57.1 | -3.14 | 211.6 | 48.3 |
D. Powell
|
F | 32 | 17.5 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 9.9 | 102 | 29 | 3.5 | 8.3 | 43.8 | 0.0 | 68.2 | 0.69 | 221.9 | 43.8 |
J. Huestis
|
F | 34 | 19.9 | 5.1 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 10.2 | 128 | 31 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 34.9 | 25.0 | 63.6 | 2.01 | 179.8 | 39.5 |
A. Zimmermann
|
F | 30 | 14.2 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 6.7 | 84 | 27 | 3.1 | 10.0 | 46.4 | 33.3 | 72.7 | 2.34 | 193.4 | 50.0 |
J. Gage
|
F | 30 | 8.8 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 19 | 25 | 0.8 | 3.6 | 37.5 | 26.1 | 83.3 | 0.12 | 173.2 | 46.9 |
J. Mann
|
G | 33 | 19.6 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 7.4 | 100 | 30 | 3.3 | 7.2 | 25.9 | 0.0 | 55.6 | 1.68 | 183.3 | 25.9 |
G. Harris
|
G | 12 | 13.5 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 6.1 | 34 | 9 | 3.8 | 12.4 | 33.3 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.8 | 554.1 | 33.3 |
J. Trotter
|
F-C | 25 | 8.1 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 37 | 25 | 1.5 | 8.7 | 33.3 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 2.38 | 269.5 | 38.9 |
S. Nastic
|
C | 23 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.3 | -30 | 19 | -1.6 | -12.2 | 45.5 | 0.0 | 80.0 | -4.19 | 178.0 | 45.5 |
A. Brown
|
F | 7 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.7 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 568.2 | 0 |
J. Ryan
|
- | 11 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 511.4 | 0 |
R. Lemons
|
G | 12 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | -18 | 6 | -3.0 | -41.2 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -3.32 | 125.0 | 50.0 |
W. Morgan
|
G | 9 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | -0.2 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.79 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG