Southern Utah Thunderbirds
2023 Team Stats (24 games)
78.7
PPG
73.7
Opp
+5.1
Margin
45.5%
FG%
36.9%
3P%
71.4%
FT%
37.5
RPG
12.6
APG
13.1
TO
82.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1035 (#240) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1100 (#223) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +21.1 (#221) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.347 (#91) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.628 (#90) | NetEff +4.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.478 (#72) | AdjNet -0.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.475 (#72) | AdjNet -0.9 |
2023 Schedule & Results
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tevian Jones
|
- | 25 | 34.1 | 16.9 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 11.8 | 9.7 | 22 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 41.4 | 33.1 | 86.1 | 0.95 | 60.7 | 49.8 |
M. Fausett
|
- | 25 | 30.7 | 12.3 | 6.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 11.2 | - | - | - | 50.2 | 41.7 | 68.2 | - | 62.3 | 57.4 |
D. Allen
|
- | 24 | 32.3 | 11.1 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 23 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 46.0 | 35.1 | 66.2 | 0.79 | 57.4 | 51.0 |
H. Butler
|
- | 25 | 32.6 | 10.4 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 8.8 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 34.8 | 27.6 | 66.0 | - | 48.8 | 40.3 |
J. Spurgin
|
- | 25 | 28.0 | 9.7 | 5.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 5.9 | 11.4 | - | - | - | 58.8 | 0.0 | 65.3 | - | 67.1 | 58.8 |
C. Healy
|
- | 25 | 17.2 | 7.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 5.4 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 44.1 | 45.1 | 84.6 | - | 63.5 | 61.0 |
D. Barnes
|
- | 25 | 15.2 | 6.2 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 76 | 5.8 | 10.1 | 49.5 | 50.0 | 82.6 | 1.22 | 66.6 | 63.1 |
M. Williams
|
G | 7 | 8.4 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 47.6 | 25.0 | 66.7 | 0.78 | 54.1 | 50.0 |
A. Anderson
|
G | 2 | 11.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 80 | 6.2 | 8.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 2.05 | 67.3 | 33.3 |
P. Fallah
|
F | 21 | 7.9 | 2.8 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.6 | -41 | -3.4 | -4.3 | 63.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.61 | 62.7 | 63.4 |
Z. Young
|
- | 6 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 83.3 | 80.0 | 0 | - | 116.7 | 116.7 |
F. Lemetti
|
- | 5 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 60.0 | 60.0 |
D. Dut
|
- | 4 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 14.5 | 0.0 |
B. Housley
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 0.93 | - | - |
M. Destremau
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | -20 | -2.2 | -14.3 | - | - | - | -0.2 | - | - |
J. Valentine
|
- | 2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
A. Marshall
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG