🐻⬇️🏀

Southern Utah Thunderbirds

Also known as: Southern Utah Thunderbirds
Program History

2023 Team Stats (24 games)

78.7
PPG
73.7
Opp
+5.1
Margin
45.5%
FG%
36.9%
3P%
71.4%
FT%
37.5
RPG
12.6
APG
13.1
TO
82.5
Pace

Model Outputs

2022-2023
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1035 (#240) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1100 (#223) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More → +21.1 (#221) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.347 (#91) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +4.8 More → 0.628 (#90) NetEff +4.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -0.8 More → 0.478 (#72) AdjNet -0.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -0.9 More → 0.475 (#72) AdjNet -0.9

2023 Schedule & Results

2023 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Tevian Jones Tevian Jones - 25 34.1 16.9 4.6 1.3 0.9 0.1 2.4 11.8 9.7 22 1.8 2.5 41.4 33.1 86.1 0.95 60.7 49.8
M. Fausett M. Fausett - 25 30.7 12.3 6.6 0.8 1.1 0.2 1.4 8.4 11.2 - - - 50.2 41.7 68.2 - 62.3 57.4
D. Allen D. Allen - 24 32.3 11.1 3.3 4.0 1.2 0.6 3.0 8.3 8.9 23 2.9 6.1 46.0 35.1 66.2 0.79 57.4 51.0
H. Butler H. Butler - 25 32.6 10.4 6.9 2.4 1.0 0.3 2.4 8.8 9.8 - - - 34.8 27.6 66.0 - 48.8 40.3
J. Spurgin J. Spurgin - 25 28.0 9.7 5.9 1.1 0.7 1.7 1.8 5.9 11.4 - - - 58.8 0.0 65.3 - 67.1 58.8
C. Healy C. Healy - 25 17.2 7.2 1.6 1.6 0.4 0.1 0.9 5.4 4.6 - - - 44.1 45.1 84.6 - 63.5 61.0
D. Barnes D. Barnes - 25 15.2 6.2 2.6 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.2 4.3 5.3 76 5.8 10.1 49.5 50.0 82.6 1.22 66.6 63.1
M. Williams M. Williams G 7 8.4 3.9 2.0 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.6 3.0 3.0 2 0.2 0.4 47.6 25.0 66.7 0.78 54.1 50.0
A. Anderson A. Anderson G 2 11.5 3.5 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.5 3.5 80 6.2 8.9 33.3 0.0 100.0 2.05 67.3 33.3
P. Fallah P. Fallah F 21 7.9 2.8 1.7 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.7 2.0 2.6 -41 -3.4 -4.3 63.4 0.0 50.0 0.61 62.7 63.4
Z. Young Z. Young - 6 2.2 2.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0 1.5 - - - 83.3 80.0 0 - 116.7 116.7
F. Lemetti F. Lemetti - 5 6.0 1.2 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.0 1.6 - - - 40.0 40.0 0 - 60.0 60.0
D. Dut D. Dut - 4 8.0 0.5 1.5 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.5 1.5 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 14.5 0.0
B. Housley B. Housley G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - 9 0.8 1.3 - - - 0.93 - -
M. Destremau M. Destremau F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - -20 -2.2 -14.3 - - - -0.2 - -
J. Valentine J. Valentine - 2 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
A. Marshall A. Marshall G 1 3.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG