SMU
2021 Team Stats (2 games)
81.0
PPG
71.4
Opp
-0.6
Margin
44.1%
FG%
37.7%
3P%
71.4%
FT%
41.5
RPG
18.5
APG
19.5
TO
92.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1347 (#63) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1333 (#89) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +32.2 (#74) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.164 (#83) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.254 (#83) | AdjNet -9.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.252 (#83) | AdjNet -9.5 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-30 | vs | Texas A&M-Corpus Christi Islanders | W | 91 - 54 |
| 2021-01-03 | vs | Houston Cougars | L | 60 - 74 |
| 2021-01-31 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 48 - 70 |
| 2021-03-12 | vs | Cincinnati Bearcats | L | 71 - 74 |
| 2021-03-18 | @ | Boise State Broncos | L | 84 - 85 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Davis
|
- | 4 | 33.0 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 13.2 | 16.2 | 53 | 4.8 | 10.4 | 47.2 | 52.9 | 77.8 | 0.69 | 61.7 | 55.7 |
F. Hunt
|
- | 4 | 25.0 | 10.2 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 7.5 | 11.8 | - | - | - | 56.7 | 50.0 | 60.0 | - | 59.6 | 58.3 |
T. Jolly
|
G | 3 | 27.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 20.0 | 28.6 | - | 87.8 | 39.3 |
E. Bandoumel
|
- | 5 | 28.2 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 7.2 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 18.2 | 66.7 | - | 54.3 | 30.6 |
E. Chargois
|
F | 5 | 26.6 | 7.8 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 5.4 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 40.7 | 28.6 | 69.2 | - | 59.6 | 48.1 |
Y. Anei
|
- | 2 | 15.0 | 6.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0.0 | 83.3 | - | 55.8 | 44.4 |
C. Smith IV
|
- | 5 | 16.6 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 42.9 | 0 | - | 72.2 | 61.1 |
D. McNeill
|
- | 3 | 25.7 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 23.5 | 22.2 | 100.0 | - | 33.6 | 29.4 |
W. Douglas
|
- | 4 | 13.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 25.0 | 100.0 | - | 90.1 | 31.2 |
I. Jasey
|
F | 5 | 18.2 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 3.8 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 16.7 | - | 51.1 | 42.9 |
J. Young Jr.
|
- | 2 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 74 | 6.2 | 8.2 | 100.0 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.48 | 79.8 | 100.0 |
A. Tabor Jr.
|
G | 2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | -0.5 | 73 | 6.6 | 8.8 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 0.71 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
E. Ray
|
F | 3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG