🐻⬇️🏀

Sacramento Monarchs

Season: 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
Also known as: Sacramento Monarchs
Program History

2001 Team Stats (25 games)

71.8
PPG
66.4
Opp
+5.5
Margin
42.3%
FG%
38.0%
3P%
72.4%
FT%
34.7
RPG
17.8
APG
-
TO
-
Est. poss./game
69.3
Adj PPG
64.3
Adj Opp PPG
#2
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2001
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1189 (#2) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1117 (#2) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +76 elo More → 1121 (#2) HCA +76 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → +5.2 (#2) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.1 More → +6.7 (#2) HCA +3.1
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.675 (#3) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +7.6 More → 0.707 (#3) AdjNet +7.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +7.7 More → 0.708 (#3) AdjNet +7.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 64.3 More → 0.612 (#2) AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 64.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 63.1 More → 0.637 (#2) AdjO 69.3 | AdjD 63.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.690 (#2) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.695 (#2) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 78 | GP 37 More → 1143 (#2) RD 78 | GP 37

2001 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2001-06-02 vs Cleveland Rockers W 70 - 65
2001-06-04 @ New York Liberty W 80 - 63
2001-06-05 @ Washington Mystics L 72 - 75
2001-06-07 vs Charlotte - Incomplete score
2001-06-09 vs Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2001-06-12 @ Phoenix Mercury L 64 - 78
2001-06-14 vs Phoenix Mercury W 81 - 59
2001-06-16 vs Portland Fire L 74 - 81
2001-06-19 vs New York Liberty L 56 - 65
2001-06-21 @ Las Vegas Aces W 87 - 75
2001-06-23 @ Houston Comets L 56 - 70
2001-06-24 @ Charlotte - Incomplete score
2001-06-28 vs Houston Comets W 64 - 54
2001-06-30 @ Seattle Storm W 65 - 59
2001-07-03 @ Minnesota Lynx W 91 - 52
2001-07-06 @ Connecticut Sun W 75 - 68
2001-07-07 @ Miami Sol - Incomplete score
2001-07-10 vs Houston Comets W 78 - 76
2001-07-12 vs Las Vegas Aces W 69 - 67
2001-07-14 @ Las Vegas Aces L 57 - 69
2001-07-19 vs Los Angeles Sparks - Incomplete score
2001-07-21 vs Dallas Wings - Incomplete score
2001-07-25 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 78 - 80
2001-07-27 vs Portland Fire W 85 - 62
2001-07-29 vs Phoenix Mercury W 63 - 47
2001-08-02 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 62 - 67
2001-08-03 vs Indiana Fever W 81 - 69
2001-08-05 @ Minnesota Lynx L 76 - 79
2001-08-07 vs Minnesota Lynx W 76 - 59
2001-08-11 vs Seattle Storm - Incomplete score
2001-08-12 @ Portland Fire W 64 - 58
2001-08-14 @ Seattle Storm W 72 - 62
2001-08-17 @ Las Vegas Aces W 89 - 65
2001-08-19 vs Las Vegas Aces W 71 - 66
2001-08-24 vs Los Angeles Sparks L 73 - 74
2001-08-26 @ Los Angeles Sparks W 80 - 60
2001-08-27 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 62 - 93

2001 Roster

Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Yolanda Griffith F 25 32.9 14.8 11.2 1.7 1.9 1.3 - 11.2 - -164 37 -4.4 -6.5 51.3 0 63.9 -1.15 55.0 51.3
Tangela Smith F 25 29.1 11.7 5.6 1.3 1.1 1.7 - 11.3 - -79 37 -2.1 -3.7 41.7 0.0 73.7 0.28 46.1 41.7
Kedra Holland-Corn G 25 27.5 10.6 2.5 2.0 1.8 0.1 - 8.4 - -97 37 -2.6 -4.8 43.5 37.0 69.8 -0.04 57.2 54.8
Edna Campbell G 25 25.7 7.9 2.8 2.3 0.6 0.3 - 7.7 - -26 37 -0.7 -1.4 37.5 43.8 72.4 0.95 48.1 45.8
Ruthie Bolton - 24 18.3 7.6 2.8 1.8 0.8 0.0 - 6.8 - -62 36 -1.7 -2.9 35.6 39.8 72.1 -0.81 50.0 46.3
Ticha Penicheiro G 18 33.3 5.9 3.9 8.0 1.9 0.4 - 5.4 - -137 28 -4.9 -7.3 30.9 21.2 76.9 -1.01 44.6 34.5
Kara Wolters C 24 12.3 5.0 2.4 0.5 0.2 1.0 - 4.4 - -73 35 -2.1 -4.7 48.6 0 81.8 -0.26 52.3 48.6
Lady Grooms - 24 18.3 4.6 2.6 1.3 0.5 0.3 - 3.6 - -33 36 -0.9 -1.9 45.3 0 80.5 0.51 53.3 45.3
La'Keshia Frett F 24 13.7 4.5 1.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 - 4.4 - -1 35 0.0 -0.1 39.0 0 83.9 0.37 45.5 39.0
Cindy Blodgett - 9 5.6 3.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 - 2.2 - 10 13 0.8 3.1 50.0 66.7 0 0.33 70.0 70.0
Maren Walseth - 3 2.2 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.7 - - - - - 50.0 0 100.0 - 69.4 50.0
Stacy Clinesmith - 13 4.8 0.8 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.0 - 1.1 - -21 16 -1.3 -10.1 28.6 20.0 0 -0.28 35.7 35.7

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG