Purdue
2009 Team Stats (28 games)
65.6
PPG
59.1
Opp
+6.5
Margin
43.6%
FG%
36.5%
3P%
75.8%
FT%
32.3
RPG
14.9
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
69.4
Adj PPG
49.8
Adj Opp PPG
#20
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1537 (#7) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1306 (#23) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1158 (#17) | HCA +85 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +21.5 (#19) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +23.4 (#10) | HCA +2.9 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.810 (#48) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.980 (#17) | AdjNet +33.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.981 (#17) | AdjNet +34.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.856 (#20) | AdjO 69.4 | AdjD 49.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.792 (#15) | AdjO 68.0 | AdjD 53.3 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.916 (#12) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.909 (#13) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1330 (#14) | RD 95 | GP 36 |
2009 Schedule & Results
2009 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Wisdom-Hylton
|
F | 28 | 0.0 | 13.8 | 9.1 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 11.3 | 15.6 | - | - | - | - | 50.2 | 33.3 | 69.9 | - | 53.8 | 50.5 |
L. Freeman
|
F | 28 | 0.0 | 11.5 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 9.7 | 7.0 | - | - | - | - | 50.7 | 20.0 | 82.7 | - | 54.4 | 51.1 |
D. Campbell
|
C | 26 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 6.9 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 7.5 | 9.0 | - | - | - | - | 41.0 | 50.0 | 82.6 | - | 50.2 | 41.8 |
F. Malone
|
G | 21 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 6.4 | 6.2 | - | - | - | - | 38.5 | 32.3 | 66.7 | - | 50.6 | 45.9 |
J. Howell
|
G | 28 | 0.0 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 4.5 | - | - | - | - | 44.0 | 45.7 | 82.5 | - | 63.1 | 59.2 |
B. Rayburn
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 22.2 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 29.1 | 22.2 |
N. Bogdanova
|
F | 2 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | - | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 45.0 | 37.5 |
L. Mioton
|
G | 6 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 53.8 | 71.4 | 33.3 | - | 69.8 | 73.1 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG