๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Purdue Fort Wayne

Also known as: Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons
Program History

2013 Team Stats (2 games)

66.0
PPG
70.0
Opp
-4.0
Margin
40.0%
FG%
37.8%
3P%
65.0%
FT%
34.0
RPG
10.0
APG
13.5
TO
-
Est. poss./game
63.2
Adj PPG
67.7
Adj Opp PPG
#235
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 996 (#173) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 925 (#221) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +102 elo More โ†’ 1023 (#130) HCA +102 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.1 More โ†’ -5.0 (#238) HCA +3.1
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ -2.9 (#208) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.428 (#202) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -9.3 More โ†’ 0.255 (#254) AdjNet -9.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -9.4 More โ†’ 0.252 (#252) AdjNet -9.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 63.2 | AdjD 67.7 More โ†’ 0.398 (#235) AdjO 63.2 | AdjD 67.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 65.9 More โ†’ 0.482 (#186) AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 65.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.430 (#204) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.447 (#199) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 144 | GP 31 More โ†’ 1000 (#175) RD 144 | GP 31

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-09 @ Auburn Tigers L 50 - 61
2012-11-13 vs Rochester University (MI) Warriors W 73 - 56
2012-11-16 vs UT Rio Grande Valley Vaqueros W 97 - 94
2012-11-17 @ Eastern Michigan Eagles L 47 - 60
2012-11-18 @ Eastern Illinois Panthers L 67 - 68
2012-11-20 vs Judson College Eagles W 92 - 22
2012-11-24 @ Dartmouth Big Green W 70 - 66
2012-11-28 @ Navy Midshipmen L 49 - 54
2012-12-01 vs Miami (OH) Redhawks W 57 - 56
2012-12-05 @ Valparaiso Beacons L 52 - 63
2012-12-08 @ Drake Bulldogs L 64 - 74
2012-12-17 @ Notre Dame Fighting Irish L 62 - 74
2012-12-21 vs Kennesaw State Owls W 70 - 47
2012-12-27 @ IUPUI Jaguars L 74 - 88
2012-12-29 @ Western Illinois Leathernecks L 50 - 62
2013-01-02 vs Navy Midshipmen W 68 - 63
2013-01-05 vs Omaha Mavericks W 96 - 78
2013-01-10 @ North Dakota State Bison L 55 - 67
2013-01-12 @ South Dakota State Jackrabbits L 57 - 83
2013-01-17 vs South Dakota Coyotes W 62 - 60
2013-01-19 vs Kansas City Roos L 59 - 63
2013-01-24 vs Western Illinois Leathernecks L 40 - 43
2013-01-26 vs IUPUI Jaguars W 80 - 79
2013-01-31 @ Omaha Mavericks L 79 - 86
2013-02-07 vs South Dakota State Jackrabbits L 74 - 80
2013-02-09 vs North Dakota State Bison L 54 - 58
2013-02-14 @ Kansas City Roos W 65 - 60
2013-02-16 @ South Dakota Coyotes W 64 - 51
2013-02-20 vs Oakland Golden Grizzlies W 77 - 71
2013-02-23 vs Bowling Green Falcons W 88 - 75
2013-03-02 @ Oakland Golden Grizzlies W 74 - 72
2013-03-10 @ Oakland Golden Grizzlies W 91 - 72
2013-03-11 @ South Dakota State Jackrabbits L 56 - 72

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Frank Gaines Frank Gaines G 31 33.9 19.6 4.0 1.2 1.4 0.5 2.5 2.2 22.0 7 21 0.3 0.4 32.4 31.6 82.4 -0.05 366.4 36.8
Luis Jacobo Luis Jacobo F 32 28.9 11.3 4.1 1.4 0.9 0.2 2.0 1.3 14.6 -20 21 -1.0 -1.3 41.5 41.2 71.4 -2.44 409.5 50.0
M. Hines M. Hines F 31 25.4 8.0 5.6 1.1 0.6 1.0 1.6 1.0 13.7 13 21 0.6 1.0 71.9 0 54.2 0.32 291.4 71.9
Joseph Edwards Joseph Edwards G 32 24.1 7.6 2.8 1.4 0.8 0.1 1.7 1.0 10.0 22 21 1.0 1.9 58.1 37.5 54.5 -0.2 337.6 62.9
Michael Kibiloski Michael Kibiloski F 27 22.6 6.8 3.9 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.9 1.2 10.5 41 17 2.4 4.5 37.5 30.4 100.0 0.93 272.5 48.4
Kevin Harden Kevin Harden G 11 29.4 6.5 4.8 1.3 1.0 0.0 2.2 1.7 9.6 -29 6 -4.8 -6.7 36.8 40.0 0.0 -3.07 171.0 42.1
Isaiah McCray Isaiah McCray G 32 21.4 4.6 3.4 2.4 1.3 0.2 1.7 1.0 9.3 34 21 1.6 3.3 41.9 25.0 41.2 0.87 189.7 45.2
Joe Reed Joe Reed F 31 18.7 4.6 3.6 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.3 9.0 26 21 1.2 2.8 44.4 66.7 75.0 0.48 669.1 55.6
Herbert Graham Herbert Graham G 11 7.0 3.6 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.4 0.0 5.2 9 7 1.3 13.3 0 0 0 0.48 0 0
Pierre Bland Pierre Bland G 32 21.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 0.9 0.1 1.7 0.2 7.6 -8 21 -0.4 -0.7 42.9 0.0 0 -0.9 685.7 42.9
Michael Onuorah Michael Onuorah - 1 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG