Purdue Fort Wayne
2013 Team Stats (2 games)
66.0
PPG
66.0
Opp
+1.1
Margin
40.0%
FG%
37.8%
3P%
65.0%
FT%
34.0
RPG
10.0
APG
13.5
TO
79.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1283 (#179) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1155 (#265) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1063 (#90) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +20.9 (#207) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +6.2 (#208) | HCA +3.3 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.337 (#134) | NetEff -5.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.523 (#184) | AdjO 65.5 | AdjD 64.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.636 (#196) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.620 (#193) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1055 (#173) | RD 143 | GP 33 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F. Gaines
|
G | 31 | 33.9 | 19.6 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 22.0 | 30 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 32.4 | 31.6 | 82.4 | 0.64 | 366.4 | 36.8 |
L. Jacobo
|
F | 32 | 28.9 | 11.3 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 14.6 | -15 | -0.5 | -0.7 | 41.5 | 41.2 | 71.4 | -0.18 | 409.5 | 50.0 |
M. Hines
|
F | 31 | 25.4 | 8.0 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 13.7 | 29 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 71.9 | 0 | 54.2 | 0.45 | 291.4 | 71.9 |
J. Edwards
|
G | 32 | 24.1 | 7.6 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 65 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 58.1 | 37.5 | 54.5 | 0.86 | 337.6 | 62.9 |
M. Kibiloski
|
F | 27 | 22.6 | 6.8 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 10.5 | 56 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 37.5 | 30.4 | 100.0 | 0.56 | 272.5 | 48.4 |
K. Harden
|
G | 11 | 29.4 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 9.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 36.8 | 40.0 | 0.0 | -0.33 | 171.0 | 42.1 |
I. McCray
|
G | 32 | 21.4 | 4.6 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 9.3 | 10 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 41.9 | 25.0 | 41.2 | 0.07 | 189.7 | 45.2 |
J. Reed
|
F | 31 | 18.7 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 9.0 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 44.4 | 66.7 | 75.0 | 0.46 | 669.1 | 55.6 |
H. Graham
|
G | 11 | 7.0 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 5.2 | 36 | 2.6 | 11.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 | 0 | 0 |
P. Bland
|
G | 32 | 21.5 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 7.6 | -29 | -0.9 | -1.6 | 42.9 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.44 | 685.7 | 42.9 |
M. Onuorah
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG