🐻⬇️🏀

Los Angeles Sparks

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Los Angeles Sparks
Program History

2026 Team Stats (1 games)

89.0
PPG
63.0
Opp
+26.0
Margin
49.2%
FG%
35.5%
3P%
95.2%
FT%
29.0
RPG
25.0
APG
17.0
TO
85.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2025 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2026 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1042 (#6) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1016 (#10) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +45 elo More → 1005 (#9) HCA +45 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.6 More → +3.8 (#10) HCA +2.6
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.7 More → +0.8 (#10) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.401 (#10) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -3.0 More → 0.401 (#10) NetEff -3.0
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +2.9 More → 0.601 (#10) AdjNet +2.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +3.1 More → 0.609 (#10) AdjNet +3.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 89.1 | AdjD 87.0 More → 0.547 (#10) AdjO 89.1 | AdjD 87.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 85.6 | AdjD 87.5 More → 0.456 (#10) AdjO 85.6 | AdjD 87.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.550 (#10) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.532 (#10) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 135 | GP 45 More → 1012 (#10) RD 135 | GP 45

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-04-25 vs NIGERIA W 89 - 63

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kelsey Plum Kelsey Plum G 1 21.0 22.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 4.0 11.0 13.0 - - - 54.5 50.0 100.0 - 80.6 72.7
C. Gray C. Gray - 1 17.0 14.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 10.0 5.0 - - - 50.0 50.0 0 - 70.0 70.0
C. Brink C. Brink F 1 18.0 10.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 5.0 12.0 - - - 80.0 0 100.0 - 85.0 80.0
Ariel Atkins Ariel Atkins G 1 23.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 16.0 - - - 60.0 66.7 0 - 80.0 80.0
S. Feagin S. Feagin F 1 10.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 6.0 - - - 66.7 0 75.0 - 73.5 66.7
T. Latson T. Latson - 1 22.0 7.0 5.0 6.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 9.0 8.0 - - - 33.3 0.0 100.0 - 37.1 33.3
Dearica Hamby Dearica Hamby F 1 16.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 100.0 - 61.5 50.0
Emma Cannon Emma Cannon F 1 10.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 53.2 0.0
E. Wheeler E. Wheeler G 1 15.0 4.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 9.0 - - - 100.0 0 100.0 - 106.4 100.0
A. Hassett A. Hassett - 1 12.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 - - - 50.0 50.0 0 - 75.0 75.0
L. Ziegler L. Ziegler - 1 14.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 0.0 - - - 25.0 0.0 0 - 25.0 25.0
Sevgi Uzun Sevgi Uzun G 1 13.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 -1.0 - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 50.0
Julie Vanloo Julie Vanloo G 1 9.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG