Los Angeles Sparks
2026 Team Stats (2 games)
87.0
PPG
92.6
Opp
-3.1
Margin
44.7%
FG%
32.3%
3P%
83.0%
FT%
30.0
RPG
23.5
APG
18.5
TO
91.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 874 (#13) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 937 (#9) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 894 (#17) | HCA +51 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -4.2 (#11) | HCA +1.6 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -2.8 (#14) | HCA +1.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.332 (#11) | - |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.410 (#15) | AdjO 88.2 | AdjD 92.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.380 (#14) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.375 (#14) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 888 (#16) | RD 84 | GP 27 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-25 | vs | NIGERIA | W | 89 - 63 |
| 2026-05-03 | @ | Portland Fire | W | 85 - 75 |
| 2026-05-10 | vs | Las Vegas Aces | L | 78 - 105 |
| 2026-05-13 | vs | Indiana Fever | L | 78 - 87 |
| 2026-05-15 | vs | Toronto Tempo | W | 99 - 95 |
| 2026-05-17 | vs | Toronto Tempo | L | 96 - 106 |
| 2026-05-21 | @ | Phoenix Mercury | W | 97 - 88 |
| 2026-05-23 | @ | Las Vegas Aces | W | 101 - 95 |
| 2026-05-29 | @ | Washington Mystics | W | 92 - 87 |
| 2026-05-30 | @ | Connecticut Sun | L | 81 - 84 |
| 2026-06-02 | vs | Las Vegas Aces | L | 69 - 79 |
| 2026-06-05 | vs | Dallas Wings | L | 96 - 104 |
| 2026-06-07 | vs | Portland Fire | W | 89 - 72 |
| 2026-06-10 | @ | Seattle Storm | W | 88 - 83 |
| 2026-06-13 | @ | Phoenix Mercury | W | 111 - 102 |
| 2026-06-15 | @ | Golden State Valkyries | L | 58 - 78 |
| 2026-06-17 | vs | Minnesota Lynx | L | 83 - 99 |
| 2026-06-21 | vs | New York Liberty | W | 98 - 97 |
| 2026-06-25 | @ | Toronto Tempo | L | 97 - 125 |
| 2026-06-27 | @ | Indiana Fever | L | 87 - 111 |
| 2026-07-06 | vs | Seattle Storm | L | 64 - 82 |
| 2026-07-08 | vs | Indiana Fever | W | 106 - 92 |
| 2026-07-10 | vs | Chicago Sky | W | 102 - 87 |
| 2026-07-13 | @ | Atlanta Dream | L | 92 - 101 |
| 2026-07-15 | @ | Minnesota Lynx | L | 87 - 96 |
| 2026-07-17 | @ | Chicago Sky | L | 82 - 96 |
| 2026-07-19 | @ | Dallas Wings | L | 82 - 90 |
| 2026-07-22 | vs | Phoenix Mercury | L | 82 - 86 |
| 2026-07-28 | vs | New York Liberty | L | 109 - 113 |
| 2026-08-02 | @ | Portland Fire | W | 106 - 101 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kelsey Plum
|
G | 2 | 19.5 | 17.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 9.0 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 60.0 | 100.0 | - | 76.6 | 66.7 |
Nneka Ogwumike
|
F | 1 | 20.0 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 18.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 66.7 | 71.4 | - | 70.4 | 66.7 |
C. Gray
|
- | 2 | 15.0 | 10.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 45.5 | 50.0 | - | 63.0 | 63.3 |
Dearica Hamby
|
F | 2 | 17.5 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 87.5 | - | 75.9 | 66.7 |
S. Feagin
|
F | 2 | 10.0 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 87.5 | - | 78.8 | 66.7 |
T. Latson
|
- | 2 | 18.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 0.0 | 57.1 | - | 41.0 | 35.7 |
Ariel Atkins
|
G | 2 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 60.0 | 50.0 | - | 60.7 | 61.1 |
E. Wheeler
|
G | 2 | 13.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 | - | 72.7 | 66.7 |
C. Brink
|
F | 2 | 15.0 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 63.5 | 57.1 |
R. Burrell
|
G | 1 | 18.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 40.0 | 40.0 |
Emma Cannon
|
F | 2 | 9.0 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 60.8 | 37.5 |
A. Hassett
|
- | 1 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
Jihyun
|
G | 1 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Sevgi Uzun
|
G | 2 | 11.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
L. Ziegler
|
- | 2 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 3.5 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 14.3 | 14.3 |
Julie Vanloo
|
G | 2 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG