🐻⬇️🏀

Lipscomb Bisons

Also known as: Lipscomb Bisons
Program History

2025 Team Stats (3 games)

72.3
PPG
62.3
Opp
+10.0
Margin
41.2%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
71.4%
FT%
37.0
RPG
14.0
APG
14.3
TO
82.8
Pace

Model Outputs

2025-2026 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2025 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 893 (#538) HCA +113 elo
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +4.1 (#269) HCA +2.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 58.8 | AdjD 60.3 More → 0.466 (#299) AdjO 58.8 | AdjD 60.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.516 (#288) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.489 (#287) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 158 | GP 30 More → 863 (#478) RD 158 | GP 30

2025 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2024-11-06 vs Mississippi Valley State Devilettes W 69 - 56
2024-11-11 vs Tennessee State Lady Tigers W 83 - 61
2025-03-11 @ Central Arkansas Sugar Bears L 65 - 70

2025 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
M. Heard M. Heard G 3 27.7 14.3 4.0 1.3 2.3 0.0 2.0 13.3 6.7 -7 -0.2 -0.3 40.0 36.4 60.0 0.54 50.9 50.0
C. McGowan C. McGowan G 3 30.3 12.0 4.7 1.3 1.7 0.0 1.0 11.3 7.3 -33 -1.0 -1.1 38.2 30.0 100.0 -0.13 50.3 47.1
J. Holcomb J. Holcomb G 3 28.0 11.7 6.0 2.7 1.7 0.3 2.3 9.7 10.3 19 0.7 0.9 41.4 38.1 75.0 0.81 56.9 55.2
B. Vinson B. Vinson G 3 31.0 11.3 6.3 1.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 10.3 15 0.5 0.5 40.0 10.0 90.0 1.02 49.4 41.7
T. Bowen T. Bowen G 3 20.0 7.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 4.0 7.7 3 0.1 0.2 58.3 50.0 44.4 0.28 65.8 70.8
O. Vandergriff O. Vandergriff G 2 17.0 5.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 5.0 2.0 0 0.0 0.0 40.0 37.5 0 -0.18 55.0 55.0
A. Melton A. Melton G 3 10.0 4.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 1.7 12 0.4 1.1 45.5 42.9 50.0 0.37 58.9 59.1
A. Cea A. Cea G 3 27.0 4.0 4.3 5.3 2.3 0.0 4.0 4.0 8.0 23 0.7 0.9 33.3 0.0 80.0 1.01 42.3 33.3
E. Bertrand E. Bertrand G 3 10.7 3.7 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 3.0 1.3 -16 -0.5 -1.1 44.4 25.0 66.7 0.2 53.3 50.0
I. Pitta I. Pitta C 2 6.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 -14 -1.2 -9.2 0 0 0 -0.82 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG