🐻⬇️🏀

Lamar

Also known as: Lamar Cardinals, Lamar
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

49.0
PPG
77.4
Opp
-17.3
Margin
31.1%
FG%
0.0%
3P%
68.8%
FT%
49.0
RPG
9.0
APG
22.0
TO
90.0
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1185 (#230) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1083 (#319) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 803 (#590) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +12.5 (#382) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -12.2 (#491) HCA +3.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -27.6 More → 0.016 (#294) NetEff -27.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 60.6 | AdjD 74.4 More → 0.222 (#591) AdjO 60.6 | AdjD 74.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.189 (#535) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.177 (#563) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 154 | GP 31 More → 659 (#589) RD 154 | GP 31

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
S. Brown S. Brown F 31 28.9 11.6 7.6 0.5 0.5 0.8 1.6 0.6 18.7 168 4.5 6.4 44.4 0 60.0 0.87 801.3 44.4
R. Mitchell R. Mitchell F 31 29.0 10.3 4.9 1.2 0.2 0.8 2.5 1.3 13.6 10 2.0 3.2 46.3 25.0 66.7 0.47 366.6 47.6
D. Minor D. Minor G 31 33.0 9.6 3.3 3.6 0.7 0.2 3.0 1.0 13.4 -318 -10.3 -15.5 38.7 27.3 80.0 -1.15 448.8 43.5
A. Wilson A. Wilson F 27 25.0 8.9 4.7 0.8 1.2 0.5 2.2 0.7 13.1 87 3.0 9.6 35.0 0.0 50.0 0.98 530.0 35.0
K. Blanks K. Blanks G 25 21.1 6.6 2.2 1.8 0.3 0.0 2.2 0.4 8.4 -248 -9.9 -17.1 22.2 0.0 75.0 -0.78 658.9 22.2
D. Minton D. Minton G 31 24.1 5.4 2.7 1.8 0.5 0.2 2.7 0.5 7.4 -338 -10.9 -19.1 50.0 0 0 -1.68 525.0 50.0
D. MuepoKelly D. MuepoKelly F 10 14.5 4.1 3.3 1.4 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.8 8.5 - - - 25.0 0.0 60.0 - 201.0 25.0
H. Webb H. Webb G 27 15.2 3.5 2.7 1.0 0.4 0.1 2.0 0.2 5.5 -185 -6.9 -17.1 66.7 0.0 0 -0.71 791.7 66.7
N. Acosta N. Acosta F 30 12.7 2.9 2.5 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.3 5.5 -177 -5.9 -15.5 30.0 0 50.0 -0.81 348.1 30.0
B. Doty B. Doty - 11 7.2 2.5 1.3 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.1 2.5 -34 -3.4 -12.7 0.0 0 0 -0.17 1400.0 0.0
O. Ebomwonyi O. Ebomwonyi F 5 9.4 1.6 2.4 0.2 0.2 1.2 0.6 0.2 4.8 -31 -6.2 -23.4 0.0 0 0 -0.34 400.0 0.0
S. Norman S. Norman F 20 7.1 1.2 1.6 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.1 3.5 -110 -5.8 -23.3 0.0 0 0 -0.89 1200.0 0.0
B. Curran B. Curran G 2 3.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 100.0 - 53.2 0.0
M. Hancock M. Hancock G 26 10.4 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.3 -138 -5.5 -16.2 0.0 0.0 0 -0.81 433.3 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG