LSU Tigers
2024 Team Stats (37 games)
85.9
PPG
63.3
Opp
+22.6
Margin
46.2%
FG%
32.7%
3P%
74.5%
FT%
46.3
RPG
16.2
APG
15.3
TO
93.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1294 (#10) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1359 (#19) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +57.2 (#5) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.984 (#4) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.998 (#4) | AdjNet +51.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.998 (#4) | AdjNet +53.8 |
2024 Schedule & Results
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Reese
|
- | 33 | 31.5 | 18.6 | 13.4 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 13.5 | 21.2 | 171 | 10.1 | 8.7 | 47.1 | 11.1 | 72.6 | 1.29 | 54.5 | 47.2 |
A. Morrow
|
- | 37 | 32.8 | 16.4 | 10.0 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 14.0 | 15.9 | 142 | 10.1 | 9.9 | 46.4 | 21.7 | 80.1 | 0.92 | 52.3 | 47.7 |
F. Johnson
|
G | 36 | 32.4 | 14.9 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 11.1 | 13.0 | 230 | 12.1 | 12.0 | 50.4 | 38.0 | 76.9 | 1.7 | 58.9 | 54.8 |
M. Williams III
|
G | 34 | 32.0 | 14.5 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 11.6 | 9.6 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 38.0 | 78.0 | - | 57.2 | 54.3 |
S. Smith
|
F | 7 | 23.1 | 11.7 | 7.6 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 6.7 | 12.7 | 26 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 66.0 | 0 | 58.8 | 0.22 | 66.2 | 66.0 |
H. Van Lith
|
- | 33 | 31.3 | 11.6 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 9.9 | 6.8 | 173 | 11.5 | 10.4 | 37.8 | 33.9 | 83.3 | 1.05 | 50.6 | 43.9 |
L. Poa
|
G | 36 | 20.1 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 5.9 | - | - | - | 42.1 | 29.4 | 84.8 | - | 60.3 | 46.7 |
A. Del Rosario
|
C | 37 | 11.2 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 5.8 | 25 | 1.8 | 5.4 | 54.1 | 0 | 57.0 | -0.08 | 56.9 | 54.1 |
K. Poole
|
G | 4 | 12.8 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 28 | 5.6 | 6.9 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 75.0 | 0.02 | 69.4 | 62.5 |
J. Kent
|
G | 32 | 8.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | -3 | -0.3 | -1.0 | 31.7 | 13.0 | 52.9 | -0.26 | 36.9 | 34.1 |
A. Velez
|
G | 23 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 61.5 | - | 41.3 | 35.2 |
A. Bartlett
|
F | 23 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 9 | 0.9 | 4.9 | 60.0 | 0 | 75.0 | 0.07 | 66.6 | 60.0 |
I. Besselman
|
G | 20 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 63.0 | 66.7 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG