Indiana State
2022 Team Stats (3 games)
67.7
PPG
73.9
Opp
-4.9
Margin
41.6%
FG%
27.8%
3P%
83.3%
FT%
26.7
RPG
12.7
APG
8.7
TO
74.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1182 (#144) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1245 (#129) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 861 (#631) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +27.2 (#121) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +6.1 (#268) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.143 (#109) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.087 (#278) | NetEff -22.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.067 (#112) | AdjNet -22.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.067 (#112) | AdjNet -22.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.417 (#536) | AdjO 67.1 | AdjD 70.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.556 (#282) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.510 (#292) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 876 (#530) | RD 154 | GP 29 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Neese
|
- | 24 | 36.2 | 14.7 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 17.1 | -90 | -3.5 | -3.9 | 40.8 | 32.3 | 86.7 | -0.33 | 316.5 | 51.0 |
C. Henry
|
- | 27 | 30.1 | 14.3 | 5.2 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 18.8 | 117 | 4.7 | 8.2 | 37.8 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 0.78 | 425.8 | 43.3 |
Micah Thomas
|
G | 3 | 24.0 | 11.3 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 10.0 | 4.3 | -18 | -0.7 | -1.1 | 43.3 | 26.7 | 100.0 | 0.3 | 53.5 | 50.0 |
K. Stephens
|
- | 27 | 27.3 | 9.8 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 15.0 | -13 | -0.4 | -0.7 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.46 | 524.1 | 40.0 |
X. Bledson
|
- | 26 | 25.3 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 44.4 | 91.7 | -0.57 | 317.9 | 50.0 |
J. Kent
|
- | 2 | 23.5 | 7.5 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 12 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.06 | 0 | 0 |
Dearon Tucker
|
- | 2 | 17.0 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0 | 87.5 | 0.74 | 56.4 | 37.5 |
J. Larry
|
- | 28 | 29.4 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 10.7 | -66 | -2.2 | -3.0 | 61.9 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 0.01 | 326.3 | 61.9 |
Z. Hobbs
|
- | 28 | 20.4 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 8.3 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 25.0 | 0 | 1.1 | 943.8 | 43.8 |
C. Crawford
|
- | 2 | 20.5 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 22 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 57.1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.51 | 64.3 | 64.3 |
S. Wilbar
|
- | 4 | 14.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 5.2 | -49 | -1.8 | -6.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.39 | 140.0 | 0.0 |
N. Hittle
|
- | 1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 20 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.2 | 150.0 | 150.0 |
M. Johnson
|
G | 1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 239 | 6.5 | 13.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 |
S. Mervis
|
- | 5 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 26 | 2.9 | 23.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | 0 | 0 |
Q. Peterson
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG