Indiana St.
Also known as: Indiana St.
Program History
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1044 (#194) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1050 (#260) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 986 (#539) | HCA +56 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +7.9 (#246) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.997 (#119) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.925 (#163) | AdjNet +21.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.929 (#162) | AdjNet +21.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.824 (#165) | AdjO 86.3 | AdjD 69.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.688 (#113) | AdjO 82.9 | AdjD 74.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.680 (#230) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.667 (#238) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1053 (#284) | RD 346 | GP 2 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-06 | vs | Illinois Tech | W | 104 - 73 |
| 2025-12-02 | vs | Eureka | W | 99 - 57 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ian Scott | - | 2 | 19.5 | 14.5 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 15.5 | - | - | - | 80.0 | 33.3 | 80.0 | - | 84.3 | 83.3 |
| Sterling Young | - | 2 | 20.7 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 8.0 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 42.9 | 87.5 | - | 66.6 | 59.4 |
| Derek Vorst | - | 1 | 13.8 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 56.4 | 50.0 |
| Enel St. Bernard | - | 2 | 21.1 | 10.5 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 16.5 | - | - | - | 90.9 | 0 | 16.7 | - | 77.0 | 90.9 |
| Camp Wagner | - | 2 | 19.3 | 10.0 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 4.5 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 55.6 | 55.6 |
| Markus Harding | - | 2 | 17.8 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 11.0 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 60.2 | 54.5 |
| Xavier Hall | - | 2 | 22.6 | 8.5 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 85.7 | 75.0 | 66.7 | - | 102.2 | 107.1 |
| Jayan Walker | - | 2 | 15.6 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 12.0 | 28 | 2.0 | 7.6 | 85.7 | 50.0 | 66.7 | 0.26 | 90.1 | 92.9 |
| Zyair Greene | - | 1 | 9.6 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | - | 61.5 | 62.5 |
| Bruno Alocen | - | 2 | 11.6 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 54.3 | 35.7 |
| Cooper Bean | - | 2 | 10.6 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 66.7 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
| Sivert Nordheim | - | 2 | 9.6 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | - | 46.0 | 45.0 |
| Jo Van Buggenhout | - | 1 | 15.5 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 23.7 | 25.0 |
| Hunter Harding | - | 1 | 14.7 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Caden Huttenlocker | - | 2 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 37.5 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG