Georgia Tech
2010 Team Stats (7 games)
63.7
PPG
68.7
Opp
-5.0
Margin
39.5%
FG%
24.1%
3P%
65.0%
FT%
37.1
RPG
14.6
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.2
Adj PPG
52.7
Adj Opp PPG
#39
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2009-2010
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1098 (#106) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1254 (#36) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1057 (#96) | HCA +89 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +15.4 (#41) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +12.8 (#58) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.816 (#48) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.941 (#40) | AdjNet +23.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.944 (#40) | AdjNet +24.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.789 (#39) | AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 52.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.668 (#57) | AdjO 63.2 | AdjD 55.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.809 (#51) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.789 (#54) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1199 (#54) | RD 119 | GP 33 |
2010 Schedule & Results
2010 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B. Ardossi
|
F | 19 | 0.0 | 18.1 | 8.4 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 12.8 | 15.3 | 250 | 28 | 8.9 | 12.5 | 49.8 | 0 | 82.1 | 5.91 | 57.7 | 49.8 |
A. Montgomery
|
G | 9 | 0.0 | 12.9 | 8.0 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 12.8 | 8.6 | 112 | 23 | 4.9 | 8.4 | 33.9 | 29.3 | 87.5 | 2.99 | 46.2 | 41.3 |
D. Foster
|
G | 18 | 0.0 | 10.6 | 6.2 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 8.2 | 10.6 | 217 | 28 | 7.8 | 11.4 | 50.3 | 0.0 | 60.9 | 3.77 | 53.6 | 50.3 |
S. Goodlett
|
NA | 18 | 0.0 | 10.3 | 5.8 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 8.7 | 7.8 | 195 | 28 | 7.0 | 11.4 | 47.1 | 0 | 60.7 | 2.6 | 50.3 | 47.1 |
M. Walthour
|
NA | 10 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 187 | 28 | 6.7 | 9.8 | 23.2 | 19.0 | 72.5 | -1.5 | 40.1 | 26.8 |
M. Bennett
|
NA | 11 | 0.0 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 170 | 28 | 6.1 | 12.9 | 28.4 | 21.4 | 68.2 | 1.57 | 37.6 | 32.4 |
J. Blain
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5 | 16 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0 | -2.83 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
S. Taylor
|
NA | 8 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 3.2 | -1.9 | 49 | 28 | 1.8 | 4.6 | 11.5 | 0.0 | 71.4 | -2.28 | 18.9 | 11.5 |
T. Blackmon
|
C | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.46 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG