Detroit Pistons
Model Outputs
2001-2002
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1096 (#8) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1163 (#4) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +3.1 (#9) | HCA +3.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.652 (#6) | - |
2002 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03-13 | vs | CLE | W | 85 - 84 |
| 2002-03-15 | vs | UTA | L | 97 - 100 |
| 2002-03-16 | @ | MIL | W | 102 - 94 |
| 2002-03-18 | @ | DEN | W | 98 - 91 |
| 2002-03-19 | @ | UTA | W | 94 - 87 |
| 2002-03-21 | @ | PHX | W | 95 - 82 |
| 2002-03-22 | @ | LAL | L | 82 - 94 |
| 2002-03-24 | vs | BOS | W | 109 - 101 |
| 2002-03-26 | @ | IND | W | 96 - 77 |
| 2002-03-27 | vs | NYK | L | 82 - 89 |
| 2002-03-29 | vs | GSW | W | 110 - 103 |
| 2002-03-31 | vs | DEN | W | 86 - 82 |
| 2002-04-02 | @ | MIA | W | 90 - 87 |
| 2002-04-03 | vs | SAC | L | 86 - 107 |
| 2002-04-05 | @ | PHI | W | 92 - 88 |
| 2002-04-08 | vs | ATL | W | 105 - 99 |
| 2002-04-10 | vs | CHI | L | 101 - 102 |
| 2002-04-12 | vs | SAS | L | 86 - 96 |
| 2002-04-13 | @ | CHI | W | 124 - 106 |
| 2002-04-16 | @ | NJN | W | 103 - 98 |
| 2002-04-17 | vs | MIL | W | 123 - 89 |
2002 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerry Stackhouse | G | 20 | 34.3 | 20.1 | 4.4 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 3.2 | 14.9 | 13.6 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 36.6 | 84.1 | - | 53.4 | 42.5 |
| Chucky Atkins | G | 21 | 30.8 | 16.2 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 12.6 | 8.2 | - | - | - | 50.9 | 40.2 | 77.3 | - | 60.0 | 57.9 |
| Clifford Robinson | G | 20 | 34.8 | 15.8 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 13.7 | 9.9 | - | - | - | 45.3 | 44.7 | 50.9 | - | 52.7 | 52.2 |
| Corliss Williamson | G | 21 | 22.6 | 14.0 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 10.8 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 49.1 | 0.0 | 84.5 | - | 55.7 | 49.1 |
| Jon Barry | G | 21 | 23.1 | 10.4 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 9.0 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 50.7 | 91.7 | - | 66.2 | 63.6 |
| Ben Wallace | G | 19 | 39.2 | 8.1 | 15.5 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 5.9 | 24.2 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0.0 | 41.7 | - | 55.3 | 57.1 |
| Zeljko Rebraca | G | 18 | 17.1 | 7.2 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 57.7 | 52.6 |
| Damon Jones | G | 21 | 16.2 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 35.2 | 26.5 | 74.1 | - | 50.1 | 44.4 |
| Michael Curry | G | 21 | 22.8 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 38.6 | 33.3 | 80.0 | - | 47.6 | 42.1 |
| Mikki Moore | - | 2 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 73.5 | 66.7 |
| Rodney White | F | 4 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 100.0 | 87.5 | - | 41.3 | 22.7 |
| Dana Barros | - | 2 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
| Victor Alexander | F | 8 | 5.4 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 26.5 | 20.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG