Creighton Bluejays
2022 Team Stats (15 games)
66.7
PPG
66.4
Opp
+2.8
Margin
43.5%
FG%
29.7%
3P%
78.4%
FT%
36.6
RPG
11.7
APG
13.1
TO
76.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1368 (#53) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1482 (#20) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1090 (#66) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +38.7 (#21) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +24.0 (#35) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.661 (#29) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.392 (#158) | NetEff -3.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.705 (#38) | AdjNet +7.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.706 (#40) | AdjNet +7.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.666 (#58) | AdjO 70.3 | AdjD 62.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.891 (#43) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.869 (#44) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1259 (#38) | RD 103 | GP 35 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Baker-Mazara
|
- | 1 | 17.0 | 17.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | 86 | 2.8 | 8.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 |
B. Hodges
|
G | 2 | 32.0 | 14.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 23.5 | -63 | -3.7 | -5.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 |
R. Hawkins
|
F | 29 | 35.5 | 13.2 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 6.2 | 15.4 | 189 | 5.4 | 6.3 | 41.4 | 34.8 | 82.1 | 2.34 | 98.8 | 50.3 |
Ryan Kalkbrenner
|
- | 34 | 29.4 | 13.1 | 7.7 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 4.1 | 19.2 | 121 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 59.7 | 14.3 | 74.2 | 1.56 | 133.5 | 60.1 |
Ryan Nembhard
|
- | 21 | 35.8 | 12.1 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 5.9 | 11.0 | 96 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 41.5 | 34.0 | 79.3 | 0.64 | 93.5 | 48.0 |
A. O'Connell
|
- | 25 | 33.6 | 11.6 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 6.6 | 11.7 | 59 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 42.1 | 33.7 | 88.5 | 0.11 | 82.6 | 51.8 |
A. Yetna
|
F | 1 | 29.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 23.0 | 94 | 3.0 | 5.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.77 | 0 | 0 |
A. Kaluma
|
- | 31 | 26.7 | 10.4 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 10.5 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 43.8 | 26.2 | 70.7 | -0.13 | 89.4 | 48.8 |
T. Alexander
|
- | 35 | 26.5 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 9.1 | -27 | -5.4 | -6.4 | 45.3 | 26.3 | 79.6 | 0.57 | 86.6 | 49.2 |
C. Carter
|
G | 1 | 33.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 62 | 2.3 | 10.2 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.63 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
N. Springs
|
F | 1 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 21 | 1.3 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 |
K. Feazell
|
F | 29 | 9.1 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 3.9 | -55 | -1.6 | -6.3 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.89 | 92.4 | 50.0 |
M. Parker
|
F | 1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 | 0 | 0 |
R. Andronikashvili
|
G | 28 | 13.8 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.1 | -35 | -1.1 | -2.9 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 58.3 | 0.04 | 55.7 | 30.6 |
Shereef Mitchell
|
G | 2 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 11 | 1.8 | 4.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 |
D. Davis
|
G | 11 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 196 | 5.3 | 7.5 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 1.09 | 150.0 | 150.0 |
J. Christofilis
|
- | 9 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | -0.3 | -3 | -0.2 | -2.5 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.18 | 14.3 | 14.3 |
M. Kancleris
|
- | 7 | 2.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | -17 | -1.2 | -20.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.09 | 26.6 | 0.0 |
A. Jones
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 198 | 6.0 | 9.1 | - | - | - | 1.55 | - | - |
M. Miller
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 2.4 | 3.6 | - | - | - | 0.4 | - | - |
Z. Yates
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
J. Bolden
|
G | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -47 | -2.0 | -4.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.26 | 0 | 0 |
J. Watts
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9 | 1.0 | 8.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.15 | 0 | 0 |
M. Quartlebaum
|
F | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 107 | 10.7 | 50.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.13 | 0 | 0 |
K. Burns
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 32 | 5.3 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 |
Sami Osmani
|
- | 8 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG