Cornell Big Red
2011 Team Stats (9 games)
67.4
PPG
70.2
Opp
-2.5
Margin
39.4%
FG%
35.0%
3P%
67.0%
FT%
31.9
RPG
14.0
APG
13.0
TO
78.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1287 (#185) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1187 (#243) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +20.0 (#222) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.371 (#80) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.283 (#156) | NetEff -8.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.111 (#108) | AdjNet -18.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.110 (#108) | AdjNet -18.1 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Wroblewski
|
G | 14 | 33.2 | 12.8 | 3.6 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 6.3 | 14.9 | - | - | - | 40.9 | 38.6 | 83.3 | - | 88.4 | 50.6 |
D. Ferry
|
G | 16 | 28.6 | 11.2 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 6.1 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 33.0 | 30.7 | 81.2 | - | 86.5 | 44.8 |
E. Peck
|
F | 15 | 22.7 | 11.2 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 9.9 | - | - | - | 36.8 | 32.1 | 60.0 | - | 74.6 | 41.6 |
A. Osgood
|
F | 6 | 24.5 | 9.2 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 68.0 | 100.0 | 56.0 | - | 76.4 | 70.0 |
M. Groebe
|
G | 14 | 17.8 | 6.9 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 37.7 | 38.9 | 80.0 | - | 87.0 | 50.9 |
J. Gray
|
G | 15 | 16.5 | 5.9 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 6.7 | - | - | - | 44.7 | 42.9 | 78.9 | - | 80.4 | 57.4 |
M. Coury
|
F-C | 16 | 17.2 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 7.9 | - | - | - | 56.2 | 0 | 69.2 | - | 107.4 | 56.2 |
A. Wire
|
F | 16 | 18.9 | 4.1 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 9.1 | - | - | - | 38.5 | 0.0 | 70.0 | - | 108.6 | 38.5 |
A. Gatlin
|
G-F | 10 | 7.3 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 3.6 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 83.3 | - | 119.5 | 41.7 |
J. Figini
|
F | 13 | 9.7 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 25.0 | 66.7 | - | 58.2 | 30.3 |
D. Tarwater
|
F | 4 | 9.2 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 33.3 | 60.0 | - | 73.2 | 75.0 |
J. Matthews
|
G | 13 | 10.5 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 28.6 | 50.0 | - | 126.3 | 27.3 |
E. Chemerinski
|
F | 12 | 6.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0 | 71.4 | - | 76.1 | 57.1 |
M. Asafo-Adjei
|
G | 15 | 14.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 20.0 | 37.5 | - | 59.9 | 27.8 |
P. McMillan
|
F | 7 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 37.5 | 0 | - | 56.2 | 56.2 |
M. Sahota
|
F | 8 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 45.0 | 25.0 |
J. Cherry
|
G | 4 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG