🐻⬇️🏀

Columbia Lions

Also known as: Columbia Lions
Program History

2014 Team Stats (5 games)

67.8
PPG
64.8
Opp
+1.4
Margin
41.4%
FG%
42.0%
3P%
79.5%
FT%
31.8
RPG
10.6
APG
12.6
TO
70.6
Pace

Model Outputs

2013-2014
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1368 (#119) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1172 (#255) -
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More → +17.6 (#278) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.366 (#52) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -10.9 More → 0.221 (#92) AdjNet -10.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -10.9 More → 0.219 (#92) AdjNet -10.9

2014 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2013-11-22 @ Portland Pilots L 52 - 69
2014-01-31 @ Yale Bulldogs L 59 - 69
2014-02-21 vs Brown Bears W 70 - 68
2014-02-28 @ Dartmouth Big Green W 84 - 72
2014-03-07 vs Pennsylvania Quakers W 74 - 55
2014-03-18 @ Valparaiso Beacons W 58 - 56

2014 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Rosenberg A. Rosenberg F 6 28.7 17.2 4.2 1.0 0.7 0.0 2.0 7.5 13.5 - - - 46.7 43.5 81.5 - 74.9 57.8
M. Lo M. Lo G 6 29.7 13.2 3.5 3.0 1.7 0.2 2.8 6.8 11.8 - - - 48.8 55.6 80.0 - 79.3 61.0
G. Mullins G. Mullins G 2 30.5 10.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.0 2.5 7.0 4.0 - - - 35.7 33.3 75.0 - 51.9 39.3
M. Lyles M. Lyles G 6 26.7 8.3 4.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 5.5 7.3 - - - 45.5 52.9 83.3 - 70.1 59.1
C. Osetkowski C. Osetkowski C 6 19.3 6.7 2.3 1.3 0.3 0.7 1.0 2.3 8.0 - - - 35.7 28.6 63.6 - 106.2 42.9
S. Frankoski S. Frankoski G 5 15.8 6.6 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.2 4.4 - - - 38.1 41.2 75.0 - 72.5 54.8
P. Quinn P. Quinn G 1 4.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 - - - 100.0 0 100.0 - 106.4 100.0
J. Coby J. Coby F 6 14.2 4.0 3.7 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.7 2.7 5.3 - - - 31.2 0 92.3 - 55.2 31.2
L. Petrasek L. Petrasek F 6 16.7 3.5 3.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.7 3.0 3.7 - - - 38.9 33.3 83.3 - 50.9 44.4
I. Cohen I. Cohen G 6 26.2 2.5 4.2 3.5 0.5 0.2 1.3 1.7 7.8 - - - 50.0 100.0 50.0 - 63.8 55.0
Z. En'Wezoh Z. En'Wezoh F 4 6.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 1.2 -0.2 - - - 40.0 0 0 - 40.0 40.0
K. Jackson K. Jackson G 4 11.8 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.8 3.2 -1.2 22 2.0 2.0 15.4 0.0 0 0.74 15.4 15.4
N. Springwater N. Springwater G 4 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 0.0 0.0
C. McComber C. McComber F 1 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
C. Voss C. Voss C 3 2.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG